Benchmarking foundation potentials against quantum chemistry methods for predicting molecular redox potentials
Yicheng Chen, Lixue Cheng, Yan Jing, Peichen Zhong

TL;DR
This paper evaluates machine learning foundation potentials for predicting molecular redox potentials, demonstrating high accuracy for PCET reactions and proposing a hybrid workflow with DFT refinement to improve predictions and screening efficiency.
Contribution
It benchmarks FPs against DFT for redox potentials and introduces a hybrid workflow combining FPs and DFT for scalable virtual screening.
Findings
FPs achieve high accuracy for PCET reactions.
Performance drops for multi-electron ET reactions.
Hybrid workflow improves prediction robustness.
Abstract
Computational high-throughput virtual screening is essential for identifying redox-active molecules for sustainable applications such as electrochemical carbon capture. A primary challenge in this approach is the high computational cost associated with accurate quantum chemistry calculations. Machine learning foundation potentials (FPs) trained on extensive density functional theory (DFT) calculations offer a computationally efficient alternative. Here, we benchmark the MACE-OMol-0 and UMA FPs against a hierarchy of DFT functionals for predicting experimental molecular redox potentials for both electron transfer (ET) and proton-coupled electron transfer (PCET) reactions. We find that these FPs achieve exceptional accuracy for PCET processes, rivaling their target DFT method. However, the performance is diminished for ET reactions, particularly for multi-electron transfers involving…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
