Grothendieck topologies with logarithmic modifications
Xianyu Hu, Maximilian Schimpf

TL;DR
This paper introduces new Grothendieck topologies for fs log schemes that incorporate log modifications as covers, refining existing topologies and ensuring functoriality, with applications to sheaf theory and valuative spaces.
Contribution
It formalizes the m-topologies for fs log schemes, correcting previous errors and establishing their properties and relationships to existing topologies.
Findings
Defined m-open, m-étale, m-smooth, m-fppf, m-fpqc topologies for fs log schemes.
Characterized sheaves on these new sites and their relation to existing topologies.
Connected the m-open site to Kato's valuative space.
Abstract
Many concepts in logarithmic geometry are invariant under log blowups. To formalize this invariance, we introduce the m-open, m-\'etale, m-smooth, m-fppf, and m-fpqc topologies for fs log schemes. These refine the standard topologies from scheme theory by treating log modifications as covers. In constructing them, we identify and correct errors in the definitions of log modifications and the full log \'etale topology. Our m-topologies are variants of those introduced by Niziol and Park; specifically, the m-\'etale topology is a subtopology of Kato's full log \'etale topology, characterized by a stronger lifting property than for log \'etale maps. This strengthening ensures the functoriality of the corresponding small site. We also characterize the sheaves for all these sites and connect the m-open site to Kato's valuative space.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
