TL;DR
AIRe is an adaptive training method for implicit neural representations that dynamically prunes neurons and densifies input frequencies, resulting in smaller models with comparable or better reconstruction quality.
Contribution
It introduces a novel adaptive training scheme combining neuron pruning and input frequency densification for improved INR efficiency.
Findings
Reduces model size without sacrificing quality
Improves reconstruction accuracy through adaptive spectrum expansion
Demonstrates effectiveness on images and SDFs
Abstract
Encoding input coordinates with sinusoidal functions into multilayer perceptrons (MLPs) has proven effective for implicit neural representations (INRs) of low-dimensional signals, enabling the modeling of high-frequency details. However, selecting appropriate input frequencies and architectures while managing parameter redundancy remains an open challenge, often addressed through heuristics and heavy hyperparameter optimization schemes. In this paper, we introduce AIRe (daptive mplicit neural presentation), an adaptive training scheme that refines the INR architecture over the course of optimization. Our method uses a neuron pruning mechanism to avoid redundancy and input frequency densification to improve representation capacity, leading to an improved trade-off between network size and reconstruction quality. For pruning, we first identify…
Peer Reviews
Decision·Submitted to ICLR 2026
**S1. Exploration of INR-specific network pruning.** The paper tackles a timely and important problem—adapting pruning strategies to the unique characteristics of implicit neural representations (INRs). This direction is both compelling and relevant, as multilayer perceptrons (MLPs) remain a major computational bottleneck in tasks such as neural rendering. The proposed approach demonstrates clear benefits over general-purpose pruning methods (Table 2), showing consistent and INR-aware improvemen
**W1. Limited performance gains on relevant or real-world tasks.** The most extensive experiments (Table 8, supplementary) show only marginal improvements on the NeRF reconstruction task. The proposed method achieves roughly 20 % model-size reduction but delivers only minor accuracy gains over the same-size model trained from scratch. This raises questions about its effectiveness for complex, practically relevant scenarios such as neural rendering. **W2. Missing analysis of inference efficiency
The integration of pruning and frequency densification within INR training is innovative and addresses a key limitation—manual architecture tuning. In addition, the paper provides mathematical proofs (Theorem 1 and 2) explaining spectral densification and pruning stability, enhancing methodological rigor.
[1] The method only tested on low-dimensional signals (2D images, SDFs, small NeRF scenes). Therefore, it should be tested on different kinds of datasets. For example, PDEs. [2] One of the major drawbacks of INR is the long training time. By adding pruning and densification, will it increase the training time? An analysis of training time should be provided. [3[How about the GPU comsumption? Like the Gfloop [4]I understand that it was applied to SIREN and FINER and reports some results. Howe
1. The paper proposes pruning and densification strategies for INR, including the TWD mechanism to transfer information from low-contributing neurons. 2. Experiments across multiple tasks comprehensively validate the approach, showing that it reduces model size while maintaining or sometimes improving reconstruction quality. 3. The work has potential significance for pruning and densification in the INR domain.
1.Some theoretical explanations are unclear. It is not specified how the 2ωj frequency is determined during densification and why this particular frequency is chosen. 2.Discussion of pruning effects on input and hidden layers is limited.For the SDF task (Lines 324–334), hidden layers are pruned, while for the image fitting task (Lines 378–385), input neurons are pruned. The paper only mentions that pruning the input layer may harm reconstruction. 3.The pruning threshold ϵ is not clearly define
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
