MUStReason: A Benchmark for Diagnosing Pragmatic Reasoning in Video-LMs for Multimodal Sarcasm Detection
Anisha Saha, Varsha Suresh, Timothy Hospedales, Vera Demberg

TL;DR
This paper introduces MUStReason, a benchmark for diagnosing pragmatic reasoning in Video-LMs for multimodal sarcasm detection, highlighting current model limitations and proposing a new framework to improve understanding of implied intentions.
Contribution
It presents MUStReason, a diagnostic benchmark with annotations for multimodal sarcasm detection, and proposes PragCoT, a framework to enhance VideoLMs' focus on implied intentions.
Findings
VideoLMs struggle with sarcasm detection across modalities.
MUStReason effectively evaluates reasoning capabilities of models.
PragCoT improves focus on implied intentions in VideoLMs.
Abstract
Sarcasm is a specific type of irony which involves discerning what is said from what is meant. Detecting sarcasm depends not only on the literal content of an utterance but also on non-verbal cues such as speaker's tonality, facial expressions and conversational context. However, current multimodal models struggle with complex tasks like sarcasm detection, which require identifying relevant cues across modalities and pragmatically reasoning over them to infer the speaker's intention. To explore these limitations in VideoLMs, we introduce MUStReason, a diagnostic benchmark enriched with annotations of modality-specific relevant cues and underlying reasoning steps to identify sarcastic intent. In addition to benchmarking sarcasm classification performance in VideoLMs, using MUStReason we quantitatively and qualitatively evaluate the generated reasoning by disentangling the problem into…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
