Robust Decision Making with Partially Calibrated Forecasts
Shayan Kiyani, Hamed Hassani, George Pappas, and Aaron Roth

TL;DR
This paper investigates how decision makers should act based on partially calibrated forecasts, establishing a minimax optimal decision rule that is computationally feasible and aligns with trusting predictions under weaker calibration conditions.
Contribution
It introduces a minimax framework for decision making with partially calibrated forecasts and characterizes optimal policies, showing trust in predictions under decision calibration.
Findings
Minimax optimal decision rule derived via duality.
Trust in predictions aligns with decision calibration, a weaker calibration notion.
Efficient algorithms for decision rules in regression models.
Abstract
Calibration has emerged as a foundational goal in ``trustworthy machine learning'', in part because of its strong decision theoretic semantics. Independent of the underlying distribution, and independent of the decision maker's utility function, calibration promises that amongst all policies mapping predictions to actions, the uniformly best policy is the one that ``trusts the predictions'' and acts as if they were correct. But this is true only of \emph{fully calibrated} forecasts, which are tractable to guarantee only for very low dimensional prediction problems. For higher dimensional prediction problems (e.g. when outcomes are multiclass), weaker forms of calibration have been studied that lack these decision theoretic properties. In this paper we study how a conservative decision maker should map predictions endowed with these weaker (``partial'') calibration guarantees to actions,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
