Using Type-II Cepheids as Extragalactic Standard Candles: Distances to M31
V. D. Pipwala (1,2,3,4), H. N. Lala (5), B. Lemasle (6), E. K. Grebel (1), G. Bono (2,4), G. Fiorentino (2) ((1) Astronomisches Rechen-Institut, Zentrum fuer Astronomie der Universitaet Heidelberg, Monchhofstr. 12-14, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany (2) Dipartimento di Fisica

TL;DR
This study demonstrates that Type-II Cepheids can serve as reliable standard candles for measuring extragalactic distances, providing results consistent with established methods and expanding the toolkit for cosmic distance calibration.
Contribution
The paper introduces a Bayesian robust regression approach to calibrate T2C PL and PW relations and validates their use for distance measurement to M31, a novel application of T2Cs.
Findings
Distance to M31 measured as 24.409 mag with T2Cs
T2Cs yield distances consistent with other methods
T2Cs are effective for probing galaxies without young populations
Abstract
Several standard candles have been tested and used to measure accurate extragalactic distances over the past decades. There have been discussions regarding the possibility of using Type-II Cepheids (T2Cs) as an alternative tool, but rarely was this ever implemented. The aim of this project is to assert the use of T2Cs as a new avenue for calibrating the extragalactic distance scale, by using M31 as a benchmark galaxy. Since Ordinary Least Squares regression methods are not immune to outliers and offer an incomplete treatment of the uncertainties, we favor a Bayesian robust regression model to compute new Period--Luminosity (PL) and Period--Wesenheit (PW) relations calibrated using 100 T2Cs, 1000 fundamental-mode and 750 first-overtone classical Cepheids (CCs) in the LMC. Using these relations, we employ a classification routine based on Bhattacharyya distances to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
