Towards Personalized Treatment Plan: Geometrical Model-Agnostic Approach to Counterfactual Explanations
Daniel Sin, Milad Toutounchian

TL;DR
This paper introduces SSBA, a model-agnostic, geometrical approach for generating realistic counterfactual explanations in high-dimensional data, outperforming existing methods in accuracy and efficiency.
Contribution
The authors propose a novel discretized boundary approximation method called SSBA for counterfactual explanations, handling constraints and high-dimensional data effectively.
Findings
Reduces counterfactual distance by 5% to 50% compared to existing methods.
Handles real-world constraints like immutable features effectively.
Maintains comparable runtime to grid-based approaches across datasets.
Abstract
In our article, we describe a method for generating counterfactual explanations in high-dimensional spaces using four steps that involve fitting our dataset to a model, finding the decision boundary, determining constraints on the problem, and computing the closest point (counterfactual explanation) from that boundary. We propose a discretized approach where we find many discrete points on the boundary and then identify the closest feasible counterfactual explanation. This method, which we later call (SSBA), applies binary search to find decision boundary points and then searches for the closest boundary point. Across four datasets of varying dimensionality, we show that our method can outperform current methods for counterfactual generation with reductions in distance between to in terms of the norm. Our method…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
