A Sociophonetic Analysis of Racial Bias in Commercial ASR Systems Using the Pacific Northwest English Corpus
Michael Scott, Siyu Liang, Alicia Wassink, Gina-Anne Levow

TL;DR
This study systematically evaluates racial bias in commercial ASR systems using the Pacific Northwest English corpus, revealing that dialectal phonetic variation significantly impacts recognition accuracy across ethnic groups.
Contribution
It introduces a sociophonetic evaluation framework and a Phonetic Error Rate metric to link linguistic variation with ASR bias, highlighting the importance of dialectal diversity in training data.
Findings
Vowel quality variation affects error rates across ethnic groups.
African American speakers experience the highest recognition errors.
Dialectal phonetic features are primary sources of ASR bias.
Abstract
This paper presents a systematic evaluation of racial bias in four major commercial automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems using the Pacific Northwest English (PNWE) corpus. We analyze transcription accuracy across speakers from four ethnic backgrounds (African American, Caucasian American, ChicanX, and Yakama) and examine how sociophonetic variation contributes to differential system performance. We introduce a heuristically-determined Phonetic Error Rate (PER) metric that links recognition errors to specific linguistically motivated variables derived from sociophonetic annotation. Our analysis of eleven sociophonetic features reveals that vowel quality variation, particularly resistance to the low-back merger and pre-nasal merger patterns, is systematically associated with differential error rates across ethnic groups, with the most pronounced effects for African American speakers…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
