On the complexity of the free space of a translating box in R^3
Gabriel Nivasch

TL;DR
This paper establishes tight quadratic bounds on the complexity of the free space for translating boxes and certain convex polygons amidst obstacles in three-dimensional space, resolving previous open questions.
Contribution
It proves that the free space complexity for a translating box or convex polygon with parallel edges is O(n^2), settling the asymptotic bounds for these cases.
Findings
Free space complexity for a box is O(n^2).
Free space complexity for convex polygons with parallel edges is O(n^2).
Results settle the asymptotic worst-case complexity for these shapes.
Abstract
Consider a convex polyhedral robot that can translate (without rotating) amidst a finite set of non-moving polyhedral obstacles in . The "free space" of is the set of all positions in which is disjoint from the interior of every obstacle. Aronov and Sharir (1997) derived an upper bound of for the combinatorial complexity of , where is the total number of vertices of the obstacles, and the complexity of is assumed constant. Halperin and Yap (1993) showed that, if is either a box or a "flat" convex polygon, then a tighter bound of holds. Here is the inverse Ackermann function. In this paper we prove that if is a box, then the complexity of is . Furthermore, if is a convex polygon whose edges come in parallel pairs, then the complexity of $\mathcal…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComputational Geometry and Mesh Generation · Optimization and Search Problems · Robotic Path Planning Algorithms
