Energy-Efficient UAV-Enabled MEC Systems: NOMA, FDMA, or TDMA Offloading?
Qingjie Wu, Miao Cui, Guangchi Zhang, Beixiong Zheng, Xiaoli Chu, Qingqing Wu

TL;DR
This paper compares the energy efficiency of NOMA, FDMA, and TDMA offloading schemes in UAV-enabled MEC systems under finite and infinite blocklengths, revealing TDMA's consistent advantage and nuanced NOMA performance.
Contribution
It provides a theoretical comparison of three multiple access schemes' energy consumption in UAV-MEC systems and proposes an optimization algorithm for energy minimization.
Findings
TDMA always consumes less energy than FDMA.
NOMA's energy efficiency is not always better than FDMA with finite blocklengths.
The proposed algorithm reduces energy consumption effectively.
Abstract
Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-enabled mobile edge computing (MEC) systems can use different multiple access schemes to coordinate multi-user task offloading. However, it is still unknown which scheme is the most energy-efficient, especially when the offloading blocklength is finite. To answer this question, this paper minimizes and compares the MEC-related energy consumption of non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA), frequency division multiple access (FDMA), and time division multiple access (TDMA)-based offloading schemes within UAV-enabled MEC systems, considering both infinite and finite blocklength scenarios. Through theoretically analysis of the minimum energy consumption required by these three schemes, two novel findings are presented. First, TDMA consistently achieves lower energy consumption than FDMA in both infinite and finite blocklength cases, due to the degrees of freedom…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
