Partially Retargeted Balancing Weights for Causal Effect Estimation Under Positivity Violations
Martha Barnard, Jared D. Huling, Julian Wolfson

TL;DR
This paper introduces a new balancing weights method for causal effect estimation that effectively handles positivity violations by relaxing constraints, maintaining consistency under certain conditions, and reducing variance.
Contribution
It proposes a novel weighting approach that mitigates positivity violations while preserving the original estimand, with theoretical guarantees and practical evaluations.
Findings
Estimator is consistent under correct propensity score model or balanced effect modifiers.
Method reduces asymptotic variance when positivity violations are present.
Effective in synthetic, observational, and trial transport data applications.
Abstract
Positivity violations, which occur when some subgroups either always or never receive a treatment of interest, pose significant challenges for causal effect estimation with observational data. Recent balancing weight methods have proved to be highly effective in confounding control, however their utility is diminished in the presence of positivity violations, resulting in bias and excess variance. Approaches that deal with positivity violations, on the other hand, work by targeting a modified estimand that may be misaligned with the original research question. To address these challenges, we propose a novel balancing weights approach, which mitigates positivity violations while attempting to retain the original estimand by a targeted relaxation of the balancing constraints. Our proposed weighted estimator is consistent for the original estimand when either 1) the implied propensity…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
