Limitations of Proprioceptive Working Memory
Caitlin Callaghan, David J Reinkensmeyer

TL;DR
This study investigates how proprioceptive working memory affects movement reproduction accuracy, revealing systematic distortions, decay over seconds, and a limited memory span of four movements, with implications for activities relying on movement recall.
Contribution
It provides novel empirical evidence on the decay and distortions in proprioceptive working memory during movement reproduction tasks.
Findings
Errors are greater when reproducing from memory than simultaneous reproduction.
Memory-induced distortions include temporal lag and movement direction errors.
Memory accuracy declines within seconds, with a span limited to four movements.
Abstract
Recalling previously experienced movements is essential for a range of activities, including sports, music, and rehabilitation, yet little is known about the accuracy and decay of proprioceptive working memory. We examined how introducing a short-term memory component affected movement reproduction accuracy by comparing movement reproduction under two conditions: simultaneous reproduction (SimRep) and memorized reproduction (MemRep). In Experiment 1 (N = 191), participants felt a 5-s haptic trajectory with one hand and reproduced it with the other hand simultaneously or immediately after the template ended. Errors were greater in MemRep than SimRep (31.1 deg vs. 21.5 deg, p < 0.001). MemRep trajectories showed systematic temporal distortions: participants lagged fast movements and led slow ones (R = -0.32, p = 0.01), unlike the ~279 ms lag in SimRep. In Experiment 2 (N = 33), we varied…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
