Dynamical Dark Energy Meets Varying Electron Mass: Implications for Phantom Crossing and the Hubble Constant
Adam Smith, Emre \"Oz\"ulker, Eleonora Di Valentino, Carsten van de Bruck

TL;DR
This study explores how varying electron mass and dynamical dark energy models influence late-time cosmic acceleration, the phantom divide crossing, and the Hubble tension, using latest cosmological data to assess model preferences and parameter impacts.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive analysis of combined varying electron mass and dark energy models, highlighting their effects on cosmological parameters and the Hubble tension.
Findings
Dynamical dark energy models favor phantom divide crossing.
Varying electron mass increases the Hubble constant $H_0$.
CPL models better accommodate late-time dynamics and $H_0$ alleviation.
Abstract
We investigate the interplay between varying electron mass () and dynamical dark energy by analysing the Chevallier-Polarski-Linder (CPL) parametrization and its non-crossing variants, both with and without a varying- component. Our aim is to assess whether the preference for late-time dynamics and phantom divide line (PDL) crossing persists when early-time physics is introduced, and whether these combined models improve the alleviation of the Hubble tension compared to the varying- extension alone. Using the latest CMB, BAO, and supernova datasets, we derive updated constraints on CDM, CPL, and their extensions, and examine their impact on and the preference for late-time dynamics. We find that CDM+ yields the largest upward shift in , while replacing with the CPL parametrization or its non-crossing variants provides modest…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
