TL;DR
This paper evaluates SAM2-based fire segmentation methods, emphasizing bounding box prompts and lightweight models for real-time mobile deployment, and establishes benchmarks for future domain-specific segmentation research.
Contribution
It systematically assesses SAM2 variants with various prompts for fire segmentation, highlighting the effectiveness of bounding box prompts and lightweight models for mobile applications.
Findings
Bounding box prompts outperform automatic and point-based prompts.
Box+MP achieves highest IoU (0.64) and Dice (0.75) on Khan dataset.
Lightweight variants like TinySAM and MobileSAM are suitable for edge deployment.
Abstract
Fire segmentation remains a critical challenge in computer vision due to flames' irregular boundaries, translucent edges, and highly variable intensities. While the Segment Anything Models (SAM and SAM2) have demonstrated impressive cross-domain generalization capabilities, their effectiveness in fire segmentation -- particularly under mobile deployment constraints -- remains largely unexplored. This paper presents the first comprehensive evaluation of SAM2 variants for fire segmentation, focusing on bounding box prompting strategies to enhance deployment feasibility. We systematically evaluate four SAM2.1 variants (tiny, small, base_plus, large) alongside mobile-oriented variants (TinySAM, MobileSAM) across three fire datasets using multiple prompting strategies: automatic, single positive point (SP), single positive point + single negative point (SP+SN), multiple positive points (MP),…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
