On Uncertainty Calibration for Equivariant Functions
Edward Berman, Jacob Ginesin, Marco Pacini, Robin Walters

TL;DR
This paper explores how equivariant neural networks relate to uncertainty calibration, providing theoretical bounds and empirical insights into their calibration performance in data-sparse domains.
Contribution
It presents a novel theory linking equivariance to uncertainty calibration errors, including bounds and analysis of symmetry mismatch effects.
Findings
Equivariant models can be miscalibrated due to symmetry mismatch.
Theoretical bounds on calibration errors depend on equivariance conditions.
Empirical results illustrate the impact of group size and uncertainty types.
Abstract
Data-sparse settings such as robotic manipulation, molecular physics, and galaxy morphology classification are some of the hardest domains for deep learning. For these problems, equivariant networks can help improve modeling across undersampled parts of the input space, and uncertainty estimation can guard against overconfidence. However, until now, the relationships between equivariance and model confidence, and more generally equivariance and model calibration, has yet to be studied. Since traditional classification and regression error terms show up in the definitions of calibration error, it is natural to suspect that previous work can be used to help understand the relationship between equivariance and calibration error. In this work, we present a theory relating equivariance to uncertainty estimation. By proving lower and upper bounds on uncertainty calibration errors (ECE and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdversarial Robustness in Machine Learning · Machine Learning in Materials Science · Model Reduction and Neural Networks
