Long-tailed Species Recognition in the NACTI Wildlife Dataset

TL;DR

This paper systematically studies long-tail recognition methods for wildlife species identification in the NACTI dataset, achieving high accuracy and demonstrating improved generalization under domain shifts, while also discussing limitations.

Contribution

It introduces a comprehensive evaluation of LTR techniques on NACTI, achieving state-of-the-art accuracy and providing reproducible code and data splits for future research.

Findings

Achieved 99.40% Top-1 accuracy on NACTI test data.

Improved generalization to shifted domains with 52.55% accuracy.

LTR methods show consistent benefits but struggle with severe tail class shifts.

Abstract

As most ''in the wild'' data collections of the natural world, the North America Camera Trap Images (NACTI) dataset shows severe long-tailed class imbalance, noting that the largest 'Head' class alone covers >50% of the 3.7M images in the corpus. Building on the PyTorch Wildlife model, we present a systematic study of Long-Tail Recognition methodologies for species recognition on the NACTI dataset covering experiments on various LTR loss functions plus LTR-sensitive regularisation. Our best configuration achieves 99.40% Top-1 accuracy on our NACTI test data split, substantially improving over a 95.51% baseline using standard cross-entropy with Adam. This also improves on previously reported top performance in MLWIC2 at 96.8% albeit using partly unpublished (potentially different) partitioning, optimiser, and evaluation protocols. To evaluate domain shifts (e.g. night-time captures, occlusion, motion-blur) towards other datasets we construct a Reduced-Bias Test set from the ENA-Detection dataset where our experimentally optimised long-tail enhanced model achieves leading 52.55% accuracy (up from 51.20% with WCE loss), demonstrating stronger generalisation capabilities under distribution shift. We document the consistent improvements of LTR-enhancing scheduler choices in this NACTI wildlife domain, particularly when in tandem with state-of-the-art LTR losses. We finally discuss qualitative and quantitative shortcomings that LTR methods cannot sufficiently address, including catastrophic breakdown for 'Tail' classes under severe domain shift. For maximum reproducibility we publish all dataset splits, key code, and full network weights.