Generalised Flow Maps for Few-Step Generative Modelling on Riemannian Manifolds
Oscar Davis, Michael S. Albergo, Nicholas M. Boffi, Michael M. Bronstein, Avishek Joey Bose

TL;DR
This paper introduces Generalised Flow Maps (GFM), a novel few-step generative modeling framework on Riemannian manifolds that improves efficiency and quality over existing geometric models, with theoretical unification and state-of-the-art results.
Contribution
It extends Euclidean flow models to Riemannian manifolds, providing a unified framework with three training methods and theoretical insights.
Findings
Achieves state-of-the-art sample quality on geometric datasets.
Unifies and elevates existing Euclidean models to Riemannian settings.
Demonstrates superior or competitive log-likelihoods.
Abstract
Geometric data and purpose-built generative models on them have become ubiquitous in high-impact deep learning application domains, ranging from protein backbone generation and computational chemistry to geospatial data. Current geometric generative models remain computationally expensive at inference -- requiring many steps of complex numerical simulation -- as they are derived from dynamical measure transport frameworks such as diffusion and flow-matching on Riemannian manifolds. In this paper, we propose Generalised Flow Maps (GFM), a new class of few-step generative models that generalises the Flow Map framework in Euclidean spaces to arbitrary Riemannian manifolds. We instantiate GFMs with three self-distillation-based training methods: Generalised Lagrangian Flow Maps, Generalised Eulerian Flow Maps, and Generalised Progressive Flow Maps. We theoretically show that GFMs, under…
Peer Reviews
Decision·ICLR 2026 Poster
**Originality & Significance**: The paper's core contribution is the novel and significant generalization of flow map learning from Euclidean spaces to arbitrary Riemannian manifolds. This directly addresses the critical bottleneck of slow inference in existing geometric generative models. **Quality & Clarity**: The work is technically sound, providing a rigorous theoretical foundation for the new GFM variants. The empirical validation is comprehensive, testing across a diverse set of non-trivi
**Unexplained Performance Gaps**: The three GFM variants are derived from theoretically equivalent conditions but show vast empirical performance differences (e.g., G-LSD is far superior to G-ESD in Table 2). The paper notes this but lacks an in-depth analysis of why, which is a key practical limitation. **Missing Training Cost Analysis**: The paper focuses exclusively on inference speed. However, the GFM objectives add a self-distillation loss to the standard RFM loss, implying a more expensiv
GFM is tested on TNA torsion, Earth dataset, SO3, and Hyperbolic spaces. The exponential results are well proposed.
The experiments are demonstrated on relative low-dim spaces, unlike the Euclidean algorithms, e.g., Meanflow, that can be applied to large datasets. In the case with relatively large NFE, e.g., NFE=8, there is almost no improvement. (Fig. 4)
1. The paper is well-written, and the proposed method is easy to follow and understand. 2. It extends the Flow Map Matching framework [1] to general Riemannian manifolds. [1]. Boffi, Nicholas Matthew, Michael Samuel Albergo, and Eric Vanden-Eijnden. "Flow map matching with stochastic interpolants: A mathematical framework for consistency models." Transactions on Machine Learning Research (2025).
1. **Limited experimental scope.** The experiments are restricted to relatively simple toy datasets. As shown in previous works, Riemannian generative models have broad applications in various domains, such as material generation [1], molecular conformer generation [2], and protein backbone generation [3]. As mentioned in the paper, the inference processes of these models are often inefficient. Therefore, additional experiments on real-world applications would strengthen the paper’s contribution
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGenerative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis · 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis · Morphological variations and asymmetry
