Can Current Detectors Catch Face-to-Voice Deepfake Attacks?
Nguyen Linh Bao Nguyen, Alsharif Abuadbba, Kristen Moore, Tingmin Wu

TL;DR
This paper evaluates the vulnerability of current audio deepfake detectors to FOICE-generated voices, revealing their failure and proposing fine-tuning strategies to improve detection while highlighting generalization challenges.
Contribution
It provides the first systematic evaluation of FOICE detection, introduces fine-tuning methods to enhance detection accuracy, and analyzes the trade-offs in generalization to unseen voice synthesis methods.
Findings
Leading detectors fail to identify FOICE deepfakes under various conditions.
Fine-tuning improves detection accuracy significantly.
Trade-offs exist between specialization to FOICE and robustness to other generators.
Abstract
The rapid advancement of generative models has enabled the creation of increasingly stealthy synthetic voices, commonly referred to as audio deepfakes. A recent technique, FOICE [USENIX'24], demonstrates a particularly alarming capability: generating a victim's voice from a single facial image, without requiring any voice sample. By exploiting correlations between facial and vocal features, FOICE produces synthetic voices realistic enough to bypass industry-standard authentication systems, including WeChat Voiceprint and Microsoft Azure. This raises serious security concerns, as facial images are far easier for adversaries to obtain than voice samples, dramatically lowering the barrier to large-scale attacks. In this work, we investigate two core research questions: (RQ1) can state-of-the-art audio deepfake detectors reliably detect FOICE-generated speech under clean and noisy…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
