Comparing measures of the Hubble and BAO tensions in $\Lambda$CDM and possible solutions in $f(Q)$ gravity
Jos\'e Antonio N\'ajera, Indranil Banik, Harry Desmond, Vasileios Kalaitzidis

TL;DR
This study evaluates various $f(Q)$ gravity models to address the Hubble tension, finding that an exponential $f(Q)$ model slightly reduces the tension but struggles with BAO data consistency, highlighting challenges in theoretical solutions.
Contribution
It introduces and tests specific $f(Q)$ gravity models against multiple datasets, assessing their ability to resolve the Hubble tension within a consistent theoretical framework.
Findings
Exponential $f(Q)$ model slightly reduces Hubble tension to 2.56σ.
Logarithmic and hyperbolic tangent models are inadequate.
Phenomenological models fit data but predict BAO distances exceeding observations.
Abstract
We test whether symmetric teleparallel gravity theories can solve the Hubble tension consistently with DESI DR2 BAO. We consider three functional forms: logarithmic, exponential, and hyperbolic tangent. We extend these models by allowing a cosmological constant, and compare to phenomenological models with a flexible exponential, hyperbolic secant, and polynomial decay addition to the standard CDM . We test these models against DESI DR2 BAO, CMB ( 2018 + SPT-3G + ACT DR6), local , and Cosmic Chronometer data. The logarithmic and hyperbolic tangent models do not provide an adequate solution, but the exponential model does. Furthermore, it slightly reduces the parameter space tension between CMB and BAO datasets to , down from for CDM. Although CDM faces only …
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
