Thought Communication in Multiagent Collaboration
Yujia Zheng, Zhuokai Zhao, Zijian Li, Yaqi Xie, Mingze Gao, Lizhu Zhang, Kun Zhang

TL;DR
This paper introduces a novel thought communication paradigm for multi-agent systems, enabling direct mind-to-mind interactions that uncover latent thoughts, surpassing natural language limitations and enhancing collaboration.
Contribution
It formalizes the concept of thought communication as a latent variable model, providing theoretical guarantees for identifying shared and private thoughts and their structure.
Findings
Theoretical guarantees for latent thought identification.
Framework for extracting and assigning thoughts to agents.
Validated improvements in collaborative tasks on benchmarks.
Abstract
Natural language has long enabled human cooperation, but its lossy, ambiguous, and indirect nature limits the potential of collective intelligence. While machines are not subject to these constraints, most LLM-based multi-agent systems still rely solely on natural language, exchanging tokens or their embeddings. To go beyond language, we introduce a new paradigm, thought communication, which enables agents to interact directly mind-to-mind, akin to telepathy. To uncover these latent thoughts in a principled way, we formalize the process as a general latent variable model, where agent states are generated by an unknown function of underlying thoughts. We prove that, in a nonparametric setting without auxiliary information, both shared and private latent thoughts between any pair of agents can be identified. Moreover, the global structure of thought sharing, including which agents share…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEmbodied and Extended Cognition · Action Observation and Synchronization · Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
