Comparative Analysis of Thermal Models for Test Masses in Next-Generation Gravitational Wave Interferometers
Vincenzo Pierro, Vincenzo Fiumara, Guerino Avallone, Giovanni Carapella, Francesco Chiadini, Roberta De Simone, Rosalba Fittipaldi, Gerardo Iannone, Alessandro Magalotti, Enrico Silva, and Veronica Granata

TL;DR
This study compares detailed and simplified thermal models for test masses in next-generation gravitational wave detectors, showing that reduced models are sufficiently accurate for thermal management despite complex heat absorption effects.
Contribution
It introduces and validates a simplified thermal modeling approach that closely matches detailed models, aiding efficient thermal analysis in advanced gravitational wave detectors.
Findings
Reduced models differ from detailed models by only milli-Kelvin temperature predictions.
Higher coating absorption localizes peak temperatures near the coating-vacuum interface.
Accurate characterization of coating absorption is critical for thermal modeling.
Abstract
Accurate thermal modeling of Terminal Test Masses (TTMs) is crucial for optimizing the sensitivity of gravitational wave interferometers like Virgo. In fact, in such gravitational wave detectors even minimal laser power absorption can induce performance-limiting thermal effects. This paper presents a detailed investigation into the steady-state thermal behavior of TTMs. In particular, future scenarios of increased intracavity laser beam power and optical coating absorption are considered. We develop and compare two numerical models: a comprehensive model incorporating volumetric heat absorption in both the multilayer coating and the bulk substrate, and a simplified reduced model where the coating's thermal impact is represented as an effective surface boundary condition on the substrate. Our simulations were focused on a ternary coating design, which is a candidate for use in…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
