Knowledge and Common Knowledge of Strategies
Borja Sierra Miranda, Thomas Studer

TL;DR
This paper introduces a nuanced model of strategic knowledge, including higher-order and common knowledge, demonstrating its importance in game theory and the decidability of model checking.
Contribution
It presents a detailed framework for specifying various levels of strategic knowledge and explores their implications in games and computational problems.
Findings
Higher-order knowledge influences game outcomes as shown in Hanabi.
Common knowledge of strategies is essential for solving the consensus problem.
The paper analyzes the decidability of model checking in the proposed framework.
Abstract
Most existing work on strategic reasoning simply adopts either an informed or an uninformed semantics. We propose a model where knowledge of strategies can be specified on a fine-grained level. In particular, it is possible to distinguish first-order, higher-order, and common knowledge of strategies. We illustrate the effect of higher-order knowledge of strategies by studying the game Hanabi. Further, we show that common knowledge of strategies is necessary to solve the consensus problem. Finally, we study the decidability of the model checking problem.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLogic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · Game Theory and Applications · Constraint Satisfaction and Optimization
