Efficiently Batching Unambiguous Interactive Proofs

TL;DR

This paper introduces a method to efficiently batch unambiguous interactive proofs for languages, significantly reducing communication complexity and enabling doubly efficient proof systems for certain computational classes.

Contribution

It provides a new batching technique for unambiguous interactive proofs that reduces round complexity and communication, leading to doubly efficient proof systems for broader language classes.

Findings

Batching reduces round complexity to polylogarithmic in k.

Communication per round is significantly decreased.

Enables doubly efficient proof systems for languages in certain polynomial space and time bounds.

Abstract

We show that if a language $L$ admits a public-coin unambiguous interactive proof (UIP) with round complexity $\ell$, where $a$ bits are communicated per round, then the batch language $L^{\otimes k}$, i.e. the set of $k$-tuples of statements all belonging to $L$, has an unambiguous interactive proof with round complexity $\ell\cdot\mathsf{polylog}(k)$, per-round communication of $a\cdot \ell\cdot\mathsf{polylog}(k) + \mathsf{poly}(\ell)$ bits, assuming the verifier in the $\mathsf{UIP}$ has depth bounded by $\mathsf{polylog}(k)$. Prior to this work, the best known batch $\mathsf{UIP}$ for $L^{\otimes{k}}$ required communication complexity at least $(\mathsf{poly}(a)\cdot k^{\epsilon} + k) \cdot \ell^{1/\epsilon}$ for any arbitrarily small constant $\epsilon>0$ (Reingold-Rothblum-Rothblum, STOC 2016). As a corollary of our result, we obtain a doubly efficient proof system, that is, a proof system whose proving overhead is polynomial in the time of the underlying computation, for any language computable in polynomial space and in time at most $n^{O\left(\sqrt{\frac{\log n}{\log\log n}}\right)}$. This expands the state of the art of doubly efficient proof systems: prior to our work, such systems were known for languages computable in polynomial space and in time $n^{({\log n})^\delta}$ for a small $\delta>0$ significantly smaller than $1/2$ (Reingold-Rothblum-Rothblum, STOC 2016).