The slope and scatter of the star forming main sequence at z~5 : reconciling observations with simulations
Claudia Di Cesare, Jorryt Matthee, Rohan P. Naidu, Alberto Torralba, Gauri Kotiwale, Ivan G. Kramarenko, Jeremy Blaizot, Joakim Rosdahl, Joel Leja, Edoardo Iani, Angela Adamo, Alba Covelo-Paz, Lukas J. Furtak, Kasper E. Heintz, Sara Mascia, Benjam\'in Navarrete, Pascal A. Oesch

TL;DR
This study investigates the star-forming main sequence at high redshift (z~5) using JWST data, revealing a shallower slope than expected and exploring the scatter and potential causes for discrepancies with models.
Contribution
It provides new measurements of the SFMS slope and scatter at z~5 using Hα-selected galaxies, correcting for survey biases, and compares results with simulations and galaxy evolution expectations.
Findings
Measured SFMS slope of 0.45 before correction, steepening to 0.59 after bias correction.
Found evidence for decreasing scatter with increasing stellar mass.
Identified potential reasons for slope discrepancy, including calibration issues and galaxy quenching.
Abstract
Galaxies exhibit a tight correlation between their star-formation rate and stellar mass over a wide redshift range known as the star-forming main sequence (SFMS). With JWST, we can now investigate the SFMS at high redshifts down to masses of M, using sensitive star-formation rate tracers such as H emission -- which allow us to probe the variability in star formation histories. We present inferences of the SFMS based on 316 H-selected galaxies at - with -. These galaxies were identified behind the Abell 2744 lensing cluster with NIRCam grism spectroscopy from the ``All the Little Things'' (ALT) survey. At face value, our data suggest a shallow slope of the SFMS (SFR , with ). After correcting for the H-flux limited nature of our survey using a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
