Can the CMB be Odd? Effect of a Parity-Violating Matter 4-Point Function on the Low-$\ell$ CMB Trispectrum
Zachary Slepian, Matthew Reinhard, Michael Bartlett

TL;DR
This paper investigates how parity violation in large-scale structure could influence the low-$$ CMB trispectrum, finding that non-detection does not rule out PV signals in matter correlations.
Contribution
It provides a theoretical analysis of the sensitivity of the CMB trispectrum to parity violation in large-scale structure, considering a scale-limited PV model.
Findings
Odd CMB trispectrum suppressed by about 1% relative to matter 4PCF
Non-detection of PV in CMB does not exclude PV in LSS 4PCF
Focus on Sachs-Wolfe term at low multipoles
Abstract
Here we explore from a theoretical perspective the sensitivity of the primary CMB anisotropy trispectrum to parity violation (PV) in large-scale structure (LSS). We focus on the Sachs-Wolfe term, which dominates at , after which the Doppler term takes over. We consider a model where the PV is only present out to some maximal scale of order a few hundred Mpc/, consistent with what recent LSS 4PCF measurements seem to indicate. We find that the odd CMB trispectrum must be suppressed by at least one factor of 1\%, with the distance to last scattering, relative to the input matter 4PCF. Thus, a non-detection of PV in the CMB trispectrum is \textit{not necessarily inconsistent} with a genuine detection of PV in the LSS 4PCF.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCosmology and Gravitation Theories · Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies · Computational Physics and Python Applications
