TL;DR
This paper applies XAI techniques to interpret and improve deep neural networks for microseismic event detection, achieving high accuracy and robustness.
Contribution
It introduces a SHAP-gated inference scheme that combines explanations with model outputs to enhance detection performance.
Findings
SHAP and Grad-CAM reveal model attention aligns with seismic wave arrivals.
SHAP values confirm physical relevance of feature contributions.
SHAP-gated model achieves 0.98 F1-score, outperforming baseline.
Abstract
Deep neural networks like PhaseNet show high accuracy in detecting microseismic events, but their black-box nature is a concern in critical applications. We apply Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) techniques, such as Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM) and Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP), to interpret the PhaseNet model's decisions and improve its reliability. Grad-CAM highlights that the network's attention aligns with P- and S-wave arrivals. SHAP values quantify feature contributions, confirming that vertical-component amplitudes drive P-phase picks while horizontal components dominate S-phase picks, consistent with geophysical principles. Leveraging these insights, we introduce a SHAP-gated inference scheme that combines the model's output with an explanation-based metric to reduce errors. On a test set of 9,000 waveforms, the SHAP-gated model achieved…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
