RubiSCoT: A Framework for AI-Supported Academic Assessment
Thorsten Fr\"ohlich, Tim Schlippe

TL;DR
RubiSCoT is an AI-supported framework that leverages advanced NLP techniques to make academic thesis evaluation more consistent, scalable, and transparent throughout the entire assessment process.
Contribution
The paper introduces RubiSCoT, a novel AI framework integrating NLP methods to improve the efficiency and consistency of thesis evaluations.
Findings
RubiSCoT enables scalable thesis assessments.
The framework improves evaluation consistency.
It provides detailed, transparent reports.
Abstract
The evaluation of academic theses is a cornerstone of higher education, ensuring rigor and integrity. Traditional methods, though effective, are time-consuming and subject to evaluator variability. This paper presents RubiSCoT, an AI-supported framework designed to enhance thesis evaluation from proposal to final submission. Using advanced natural language processing techniques, including large language models, retrieval-augmented generation, and structured chain-of-thought prompting, RubiSCoT offers a consistent, scalable solution. The framework includes preliminary assessments, multidimensional assessments, content extraction, rubric-based scoring, and detailed reporting. We present the design and implementation of RubiSCoT, discussing its potential to optimize academic assessment processes through consistent, scalable, and transparent evaluation.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsExpert finding and Q&A systems · Topic Modeling · Student Assessment and Feedback
