KineDiff3D: Kinematic-Aware Diffusion for Category-Level Articulated Object Shape Reconstruction and Generation
WenBo Xu, Liu Liu, Li Zhang, Ran Zhang, Hao Wu, Dan Guo, Meng Wang

TL;DR
KineDiff3D introduces a unified diffusion-based framework that leverages kinematic-aware representations for accurate 3D reconstruction and pose estimation of articulated objects from single images.
Contribution
It proposes a novel Kinematic-Aware VAE and dual conditional diffusion models to improve articulated object reconstruction and kinematic parameter estimation.
Findings
Effective reconstruction on synthetic and real datasets
Accurate pose and joint estimation demonstrated
Outperforms existing methods in articulated object modeling
Abstract
Articulated objects, such as laptops and drawers, exhibit significant challenges for 3D reconstruction and pose estimation due to their multi-part geometries and variable joint configurations, which introduce structural diversity across different states. To address these challenges, we propose KineDiff3D: Kinematic-Aware Diffusion for Category-Level Articulated Object Shape Reconstruction and Generation, a unified framework for reconstructing diverse articulated instances and pose estimation from single view input. Specifically, we first encode complete geometry (SDFs), joint angles, and part segmentation into a structured latent space via a novel Kinematic-Aware VAE (KA-VAE). In addition, we employ two conditional diffusion models: one for regressing global pose (SE(3)) and joint parameters, and another for generating the kinematic-aware latent code from partial observations. Finally,…
Peer Reviews
Decision·ICLR 2026 Conference Withdrawn Submission
The paper tackles an important and challenging problem — category-level articulated object reconstruction from single views. Integration of geometry, kinematics, and generative modeling within a single framework is conceptually appealing. The ablation on iterative optimization shows the model can improve with refinement steps. The implementation appears complete and reproducible in principle, showing non-trivial engineering effort.
Lack of true novelty: The proposed KA-VAE and diffusion combination is a straightforward hybrid of known components. Recent works (Real2Code 2024, Reacto 2024, ArticulatedGS 2025) already address similar goals with more rigorous modeling and stronger baselines. Misleading claim of “generation”: The paper never performs unconditional or cross-category generation; it only interpolates joint angles of known shapes. Incomplete evaluation: The experiments omit essential baselines, use limited datas
1. Comprehensive unified framework: The paper presents a well-designed end-to-end system that jointly addresses multiple challenging tasks—shape reconstruction, pose estimation, and novel articulation generation—within a single framework. 2. The bidirectional optimization module that simultaneously refines reconstruction accuracy and kinematic parameters while preserving articulation constraints works well. This design leverages the mutual dependencies between geometry and kinematics, likely le
1. The inputs to the model should be clarified at the beginning of the method section. Specifically: a) Is the input a single-view image with depth information? b) How is the full object point cloud (shown at the top of Figure 2) obtained? c) How is the partial object point cloud obtained? 2. Why did you choose to use PointNet and PointNet++ as there are many more powerful models? 3. The pipeline overview in Figure 2 needs improvement. The flow lines are difficult to follow and make the ove
- Novel integration of kinematic constraints into diffusion-based 3D modeling. - Demonstrates improved generalization to unseen articulations and novel part combinations. - Visualization and ablations clearly illustrate the role of kinematic priors.
- The writing of the paper needs improvement, and the overview figure cannot present the methods clearly. - Some improvement margins over baselines are modest, suggesting incremental benefit in certain settings. Moreover, it seems that it is not compared with the latest SOTA methods, but only with those from a few years ago. - Limited qualitative demonstrations on real-world data; most results are synthetic. - The novelty mainly lies in integrating existing techniques (diffusion
1. The idea of encoding everything including the geometry and kinematic informations into a unified latent space sounds reasonable to me, since the development of 3D generation models gradually switch to native 3D space. 2. The two diffusion models that respectively learns kinematic-aware informations and part geometry sounds reasonable.
1. The way the authors cite papers is really hard for reading, which I believe is due to the package or template. 2. The authors should polish the figures, especially Fig. 2. In the Pose and Joint Estimation Module, what's the difference between the two lines with (X_T, Y_T)? Does that mean a single inference step? If I understand it correctly, this is the part of a conditional diffusion model that conditions on the partial point cloud (encoded by PointNet++) and predicts base pose and joint par
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRobot Manipulation and Learning · 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis · Human Motion and Animation
