Physics-Informed Machine Learning in Biomedical Science and Engineering
Nazanin Ahmadi, Qianying Cao, Jay D. Humphrey, and George Em Karniadakis

TL;DR
This paper reviews physics-informed machine learning frameworks like PINNs, NODEs, and NOs, highlighting their applications, benefits, and future challenges in modeling complex biomedical systems.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive overview of PIML methods in biomedical science, emphasizing their roles, applications, and open challenges for future research.
Findings
PINNs successfully applied to biosolid and biofluid mechanics.
NODEs effectively model dynamic physiological systems.
Deep neural operators enable efficient multiscale biological simulations.
Abstract
Physics-informed machine learning (PIML) is emerging as a potentially transformative paradigm for modeling complex biomedical systems by integrating parameterized physical laws with data-driven methods. Here, we review three main classes of PIML frameworks: physics-informed neural networks (PINNs), neural ordinary differential equations (NODEs), and neural operators (NOs), highlighting their growing role in biomedical science and engineering. We begin with PINNs, which embed governing equations into deep learning models and have been successfully applied to biosolid and biofluid mechanics, mechanobiology, and medical imaging among other areas. We then review NODEs, which offer continuous-time modeling, especially suited to dynamic physiological systems, pharmacokinetics, and cell signaling. Finally, we discuss deep NOs as powerful tools for learning mappings between function spaces,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBiomedical and Engineering Education
