# Discovering Semantic Subdimensions through Disentangled Conceptual Representations

**Authors:** Yunhao Zhang, Shaonan Wang, Nan Lin, Xinyi Dong, Chong Li, Chengqing Zong

arXiv: 2508.21436 · 2025-09-22

## TL;DR

This paper introduces a novel framework that decomposes word embeddings into interpretable semantic subdimensions, revealing finer-grained conceptual structures and their neural correlates, advancing understanding of language and brain organization.

## Contribution

It proposes the Disentangled Continuous Semantic Representation Model (DCSRM) to identify and interpret semantic subdimensions from large language models and brain data.

## Key findings

- Semantic subdimensions are interpretable and fine-grained.
- Polarity is a key principle in semantic decomposition.
- Neural correlates support cognitive plausibility.

## Abstract

Understanding the core dimensions of conceptual semantics is fundamental to uncovering how meaning is organized in language and the brain. Existing approaches often rely on predefined semantic dimensions that offer only broad representations, overlooking finer conceptual distinctions. This paper proposes a novel framework to investigate the subdimensions underlying coarse-grained semantic dimensions. Specifically, we introduce a Disentangled Continuous Semantic Representation Model (DCSRM) that decomposes word embeddings from large language models into multiple sub-embeddings, each encoding specific semantic information. Using these sub-embeddings, we identify a set of interpretable semantic subdimensions. To assess their neural plausibility, we apply voxel-wise encoding models to map these subdimensions to brain activation. Our work offers more fine-grained interpretable semantic subdimensions of conceptual meaning. Further analyses reveal that semantic dimensions are structured according to distinct principles, with polarity emerging as a key factor driving their decomposition into subdimensions. The neural correlates of the identified subdimensions support their cognitive and neuroscientific plausibility.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/2508.21436/full.md

## Figures

7 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/2508.21436/full.md

## References

76 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/2508.21436/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/2508.21436