Remarks on stochastic cloning and delayed-state filtering
Tara Mina, Lindsey Marinello, and John Christian

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that a properly derived delayed-state Kalman filter can handle correlated delayed measurements as effectively as stochastic cloning, without the need for state augmentation, offering computational advantages.
Contribution
It revisits the delayed-state Kalman filter, showing it matches stochastic cloning in performance and clarifies misconceptions about handling delayed measurements without augmentation.
Findings
Delayed-state Kalman filter yields the same results as stochastic cloning.
Two equivalent formulations of the delayed-state Kalman filter are presented.
One formulation can reduce computational and storage costs for certain problems.
Abstract
Many estimation problems in aerospace navigation and robotics involve measurements that depend on prior states. A prominent example is odometry, which measures the relative change between states over time. Accurately handling these delayed-state measurements requires capturing their correlations with prior state estimates, and a widely used approach is stochastic cloning (SC), which augments the state vector to account for these correlations. This work revisits a long-established but often overlooked alternative--the delayed-state Kalman filter--and demonstrates that a properly derived filter yields exactly the same state and covariance update as SC, without requiring state augmentation. Moreover, two equivalent formulations of the delayed-state Kalman filter (DSKF) are presented, providing complementary perspectives on how the prior-state measurement correlations can be handled within…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
