Classification of flag-transitive $2$-$(v, k, \lambda)$ designs with alternating group $A_n$($n \le 10$) as socle
Delu Tian, Qianfen Liao, Zhilin Zhang

TL;DR
This paper classifies all flag-transitive, point-primitive 2-designs with alternating groups of degree up to 10 as socles, identifying 87 unique designs and advancing the understanding of design symmetry under almost simple groups.
Contribution
It provides a complete classification of such designs with small alternating group socles, extending existing theory and offering a comprehensive reference for future research.
Findings
87 distinct designs classified up to isomorphism
Enhanced understanding of automorphism groups of 2-designs
Improved classification framework for designs with almost simple group actions
Abstract
This paper is devoted to the classification of all flag-transitive point-primitive non-trivial - designs with the alternating group () as the socle of their automorphism groups, and 87 different designs are obtained up to isomorphism. The results of this study further improve the classification theory of designs under the action of almost simple groups, and provide reference for the follow-up study of similar problems.
| Case | Reference | |||||||
| 1 | , | , | 5 | 10 | 6 | 3 | 3 | |
| 2 | , | , | 6 | 20 | 10 | 3 | 4 | |
| 3 | 6 | 15 | 10 | 4 | 6 | |||
| 4 | , | , | 7 | 35 | 15 | 3 | 5 | |
| 5 | 7 | 21 | 15 | 5 | 10 | |||
| 6 | 7 | 35 | 20 | 4 | 10 | |||
| 7 | , | , | 8 | 56 | 21 | 3 | 6 | |
| 8 | 8 | 28 | 21 | 6 | 15 | |||
| 9 | 8 | 70 | 35 | 4 | 15 | |||
| 10 | 8 | 56 | 35 | 5 | 20 | |||
| 11 | , | , | 9 | 84 | 28 | 3 | 7 | |
| 12 | 9 | 36 | 28 | 7 | 21 | |||
| 13 | 9 | 126 | 56 | 4 | 21 | |||
| 14 | 9 | 84 | 56 | 6 | 35 | |||
| 15 | 9 | 126 | 70 | 5 | 35 | |||
| 16 | , | , | 10 | 120 | 36 | 3 | 8 | |
| 17 | 10 | 45 | 36 | 8 | 28 | |||
| 18 | 10 | 210 | 84 | 4 | 28 | |||
| 19 | 10 | 120 | 84 | 7 | 56 | |||
| 20 | 10 | 252 | 126 | 5 | 56 | |||
| 21 | 10 | 210 | 126 | 6 | 70 |
| Case | Reference | |||||||
| 1 | 6 | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | |||
| 2 | 6 | 20 | 10 | 3 | 4 | |||
| 3 | 6 | 15 | 10 | 4 | 6 | |||
| 4 | , , | , , : | 10 | 15 | 6 | 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | , | , : | 10 | 15 | 9 | 6 | 5 | |
| 6 | 10 | 60 | 18 | 3 | 4 | |||
| 7 | , | , : | 10 | 36 | 18 | 5 | 8 | |
| 8 | , , , | , , , : | 15 | 15 | 8 | 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | , , | :, :8, :[] | 10 | 72 | 36 | 5 | 16 | |
| 10 | , , | :, :8, :[] | 10 | 30 | 12 | 4 | 4 | |
| 11 | 10 | 30 | 18 | 6 | 10 | |||
| 12 | 10 | 120 | 36 | 3 | 8 | |||
| 13 | 10 | 45 | 36 | 8 | 28 | |||
| 14 | 10 | 180 | 72 | 4 | 24 | |||
| 15 | 10:4 | 36 | 180 | 40 | 8 | 8 | ||
| 16 | , | , : | 15 | 35 | 7 | 3 | 1 | |
| 17 | 15 | 15 | 7 | 7 | 3 | |||
| 18 | 15 | 105 | 28 | 4 | 6 | |||
| 19 | 15 | 35 | 28 | 12 | 22 | |||
| 20 | 15 | 105 | 42 | 6 | 15 | |||
| 21 | 15 | 120 | 56 | 7 | 24 | |||
| 22 | 15 | 420 | 84 | 3 | 12 | |||
| 23 | 15 | 420 | 168 | 6 | 60 | |||
| 24 | 15 | 42 | 14 | 5 | 4 | |||
| 25 | 15 | 70 | 28 | 6 | 10 | |||
| 26 | 15 | 42 | 28 | 10 | 18 | |||
| 27 | 15 | 126 | 42 | 5 | 12 | |||
| 28 | 15 | 70 | 42 | 9 | 24 | |||
| 29 | 15 | 210 | 56 | 4 | 12 | |||
| 30 | 15 | 210 | 84 | 6 | 30 | |||
| 31 | 15 | 126 | 84 | 10 | 54 | |||
| 32 | 15 | 630 | 168 | 4 | 36 | |||
| 33 | , | , | 21 | 70 | 30 | 9 | 12 | |
| 34 | 21 | 252 | 60 | 5 | 12 | |||
| 35 | , , | :2, , | 35 | 35 | 18 | 18 | 9 | |
| , | :, :2 | |||||||
| 36 | : | 15 | 168 | 56 | 5 | 16 | ||
| 37 | 15 | 280 | 112 | 6 | 40 | |||
| 38 | 15 | 168 | 112 | 10 | 72 | |||
| 39 | 15 | 280 | 168 | 9 | 96 | |||
| 40 | 15 | 840 | 224 | 4 | 48 | |||
| 41 | ():2 | 56 | 840 | 180 | 12 | 36 | ||
| 42 | 56 | 840 | 180 | 12 | 36 | |||
| 43 | 56 | 1680 | 360 | 12 | 72 | |||
| 44 | 56 | 1680 | 360 | 12 | 72 | |||
| 45 | , | , | 36 | 840 | 140 | 6 | 20 | |
| 46 | 36 | 315 | 140 | 16 | 60 | |||
| 47 | 36 | 5040 | 840 | 6 | 120 | |||
| 48 | 36 | 5040 | 840 | 6 | 120 | |||
| 49 | : | 120 | 3360 | 504 | 18 | 72 | ||
| 50 | 120 | 10080 | 1512 | 18 | 216 | |||
| 51 | 120 | 10080 | 1512 | 18 | 216 | |||
| 52 | 280 | 11340 | 1296 | 32 | 144 | |||
| 53 | , | , | 45 | 1575 | 420 | 12 | 105 | |
| 54 | 45 | 37800 | 10080 | 12 | 2520 | |||
| 55 | 45 | 75600 | 20160 | 12 | 5040 | |||
| 56 | , | :2, | 120 | 33600 | 5040 | 18 | 720 | |
| 57 | :2 | 120 | 100800 | 15120 | 18 | 2160 | ||
| 58 | , | :4, :2 | 126 | 4725 | 225 | 6 | 9 | |
| 59 | 126 | 2100 | 600 | 36 | 168 | |||
| 60 | 126 | 18900 | 900 | 6 | 36 | |||
| 61 | 126 | 37800 | 1800 | 6 | 72 | |||
| 62 | 126 | 14175 | 1800 | 16 | 216 | |||
| 63 | 126 | 75600 | 3600 | 6 | 144 | |||
| 64 | 126 | 151200 | 7200 | 6 | 288 | |||
| 65 | 126 | 56700 | 7200 | 16 | 864 | |||
| 66 | 126 | 25200 | 7200 | 36 | 2016 | |||
| 67 | 126 | 25200 | 7200 | 36 | 2016 | |||
| 68 | 126 | 113400 | 14400 | 16 | 1728 | |||
| 69 | 120 | 201600 | 30240 | 18 | 4320 | |||
| 70 | :2 | 126 | 604800 | 28800 | 6 | 1152 |
| Sum | Sum | Sum | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | 22 | 100 | |||
| 6 | 26 | 395 | |||
| 19 | 120 | 447 | |||
| 25 | 101 | 297 | |||
| 22 | 157 | 349 |
| Conjugate class | Orbital lengths | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | , , | Step(ii) |
| 2 | , , , | Step(ii) |
| 3 | , , | Step(ii) |
| 4 | , , , | Step(ii) |
| 5 | , , , | Step(ii) |
| 6 | , , , | Step(ii) |
| 7 | , , | Step(ii) |
| 8 | , , | Step(ii) |
| 9 | , , , | Step(ii) |
| 10 | , , , , | Step(ii), Step(iii) |
| 11 | , , , , | Step(iii) |
| 12 | , , , , | Step(ii), Step(iii) |
| 13 | , , , , | Step(ii), |
| 14 | , , , , | Step(ii), Step(iii) |
| 15 | , , , , | Step(ii), Step(iii) |
| 16 | , , , , | Step(ii), Step(iii) |
| 17 | , , , , | Step(ii), Step(iii) |
| No. | Basic block | Design | ||
| 1 | { 1, 4, 6 } | |||
| 2 | { 5, 7, 8, 10 } | |||
| 3 | { 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 10 } | |||
| 4 | { 2, 3, 4 } | |||
| 5 | { 1, 2, 5, 8, 9 } | |||
| 6 | { 4, 5, 6, 7, 12, 13, 14, 15 } | |||
| 7 | : | { 1, 4, 5, 6, 9 } | ||
| 8 | : | { 3, 5, 7, 10 } | ||
| 9 | { 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10 } | |||
| 10 | { 1, 2, 5, 9 } | |||
| 11 | 10:4 | { 4, 5, 17, 22, 27, 31, 32, 35 } | ||
| 12 | { 3, 12, 15 } | |||
| 13 | { 1, 2, 3, 8, 9, 10, 11 } | |||
| 14 | { 2, 3, 8, 9 } | |||
| 15 | { 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 } | |||
| 16 | { 2, 5, 9, 11, 12, 14 } | |||
| 17 | { 4, 6, 7, 12, 13, 14, 15 } | |||
| 18 | { 4, 6, 11 } | |||
| 19 | { 2, 3, 6, 11, 14, 15 } | |||
| 20 | { 4, 11, 12, 13, 14 } | |||
| 21 | { 2, 3, 9, 10, 13, 15 } | |||
| 22 | { 1, 2, 4, 6, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 } | |||
| 23 | { 2, 4, 5, 9, 10 } | |||
| 24 | { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 9, 11, 13, 14 } | |||
| 25 | { 4, 7, 14, 15 } | |||
| 26 | { 1, 6, 11, 13, 14, 15 } | |||
| 27 | { 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 14, 15 } | |||
| 28 | { 2, 4, 8, 15 } | |||
| 29 | { 7, 8, 9, 14, 15, 17, 18, 19, 20 } | |||
| 30 | { 7, 8, 14, 18, 21 } | |||
| 31 | :2 | { 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 13, 14, 20, 23, 24, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 34 } | ||
| 32 | : | { 1, 3, 7, 10, 15 } | ||
| 33 | { 2, 5, 6, 7, 10, 12 } | |||
| 34 | { 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 11, 13, 14 } | |||
| 35 | { 1, 3, 4, 8, 9, 11, 13, 14, 15 } | |||
| 36 | { 1, 8, 12, 14 } | |||
| 37 | ():2 | { 1, 2, 3, 10, 19, 23, 34, 37, 41, 44, 48, 52 } | ||
| 38 | { 1, 3, 19, 20, 25, 31, 34, 36, 41, 43, 44, 45 } | |||
| 39 | { 1, 17, 18, 19, 21, 26, 39, 40, 41, 42, 45, 50 } | |||
| 40 | { 2, 6, 9, 10, 15, 16, 20, 22, 37, 47, 52, 53 } | |||
| 41 | { 6, 7, 10, 15, 19, 33 } | |||
| 42 | { 2, 4, 6, 9, 13, 14, 20, 21, 22, 25, 28, 30, 31, 33, 35, 36 } | |||
| 43 | { 2, 4, 14, 20, 23, 35 } | |||
| 44 | { 5, 7, 20, 21, 24, 29 } | |||
| 45 | : | { 2, 10, 12, 16, 33, 34, 40, 45, 54, 65, 70, 71, 74, 91, 95, 102, 110, 118 } | ||
| 46 | { 1, 2, 3, 17, 21, 22, 35, 39, 54, 66, 69, 79, 91, 97, 100, 103, 109, 113 } | |||
| 47 | { 1, 4, 23, 24, 30, 36, 37, 39, 53, 65, 67, 80, 82, 92, 95, 98, 109, 117 } | |||
| 48 | { 1, 7, 24, 26, 31, 36, 60, 67, 88, 99, 102, 108, 118, 120, 122, 123, 127, | |||
| 130, 156, 162, 171, 173, 178, 185, 196, 202, 208, 212, 220, 251, 267, 272 } | ||||
| 49 | { 5, 8, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 26, 32, 34, 37, 40 } | |||
| 50 | { 4, 7, 9, 12, 18, 25, 27, 28, 31, 33, 34, 40 } | |||
| 51 | { 7, 12, 13, 15, 16, 20, 23, 34, 35, 39, 40, 41 } | |||
| 52 | :2 | { 3, 4, 7, 9, 17, 20, 22, 25, 26, 29, 45, 64, 67, 72, 83, 87, 93, 111 } | ||
| 53 | { 1, 11, 22, 23, 32, 35, 36, 47, 51, 53, 55, 59, 67, 71, 83, 88, 94, 110 } | |||
| 54 | :4 | { 11, 16, 30, 56, 98, 112 } | ||
| 55 | { 3, 6, 12, 14, 18, 23, 24, 25, 26, 28, 30, 33, 34, 37, 38, 43, 46, 49, 53, | |||
| 74, 81, 85, 93, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 106, 110, 114, 115, 121, 122 } | ||||
| 56 | { 33, 56, 63, 67, 83, 111 } | |||
| 57 | { 24, 31, 68, 99, 113, 123 } | |||
| 58 | { 2, 16, 21, 25, 26, 31, 55, 58, 71, 73, 79, 83, 85, 93, 103, 114 } | |||
| 59 | { 22, 30, 31, 80, 97, 113 } | |||
| 60 | { 1, 7, 76, 83, 119, 122 } | |||
| 61 | { 7, 11, 12, 22, 34, 46, 51, 56, 62, 68, 82, 87, 93, 94, 107, 121 } | |||
| 62 | { 1, 8, 13, 21, 23, 24, 28, 32, 35, 37, 43, 46, 47, 50, 52, 59, 61, 64, 65, 68, | |||
| 75, 76, 77, 78, 85, 86, 87, 95, 104, 105, 107, 113, 120, 123, 124, 125 } | ||||
| 63 | { 4, 5, 6, 14, 16, 19, 21, 28, 36, 43, 53, 54, 58, 59, 60, 62, 63, 64, 66, | |||
| 68, 69, 71, 73, 74, 75, 94, 95, 97, 104, 107, 108, 109, 110, 120, 121, 123 } | ||||
| 64 | { 1, 17, 19, 26, 37, 43, 51, 55, 59, 60, 64, 68, 69, 87, 89, 121 } | |||
| 65 | { 4, 5, 7, 22, 29, 37, 40, 42, 47, 64, 69, 75, 78, 80, 88, 92, 109, 115 } | |||
| 66 | :2 | { 1, 9, 23, 50, 112, 115 } |
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
Topicsgraph theory and CDMA systems · Optimal Experimental Design Methods
Classification of flag-transitive - designs with alternating group () as socle
Delu Tian111E-mail: [email protected] , Qianfen Liao222E-mail: [email protected]
*School of Mathematics, Guangdong University of Education,
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510303, P. R. China
*Zhilin Zhang333E-mail: [email protected]
*School of Statistics and Mathematics, Guangdong University of
Finance and Economics, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510320, P. R. China
Abstract
This paper is devoted to the classification of all flag-transitive point-primitive non-trivial - designs with the alternating group () as the socle of their automorphism groups, and 87 different designs are obtained up to isomorphism. The results of this study further improve the classification theory of designs under the action of almost simple groups, and provide reference for the follow-up study of similar problems.
MSC2020 Classification: 05B05, 20B25, 20B15, 20B30
Keywords: Flag-transitive; Point-primitive; Block design; Alternating group
1 Introduction
An incidence system is called a block design where a set of points is divided into a family of distinct subsets (blocks) so that every two points lie in exactly blocks with points in every block, and every point is contained in blocks. It is also generally required that , which is where the “incomplete” comes from in the formal term most often encountered for block designs, balanced incomplete block designs (BIB designs)[4]. In a design, a flag is an incident point-block pair such that . The design is called a symmetric design when , otherwise, it is called a nonsymmetric design.
The complement of a design has parameters .
Despite not being independent the five parameters and meet the following three relations:
, , (Fisher’s inequality).
A BIB design is therefore commonly written as - design, since and are given in terms of , , and by
, .
When holds, we speak of a non-trivial 2-design. A - design is called a full design which consisting of all -subsets.
A group is almost simple if it satisfies for some simple group called a socle. A permutation of that causes a permutation on the blocks is called an automorphism of . The symbol represents the full automorphism group of , which is made up of all automorphisms of . Each subgroup of is called an automorphism group of . The design is referred to as flag-transitive if is transitive on the set of flags and point-primitive (or block-primitive) if is primitive on (or ). Additional standard notations and definitions are available, for instance, in [4, 5, 10, 22].
In 2013, by using the O’Nan-Scott Theorem, Tian and Zhou [17] proved that if is a 2- symmetric design with admitting a flag-transitive point-primitive automorphism group , then must be an almost simple or an affine group. Subsequently, all flag-transitive point-primitive symmetric designs with sporadic socle were fully categorized by them [18]. In 2022, Alavi et al.[1] presented a classification of 2-designs with gcd()=1 admitting flag-transitive automorphism groups. Montinaro et al.[12, 13, 14] have recently classified flag-transitive 2-designs under special . It is meaningful to consider the classification of designs with almost simple group as the socle.
In the research on the classification of the 2- designs of the flag-transitive point-primitive group with alternating as socle, scholars have added various restrictions, mainly focusing on the following situations:
(i) Symmetric design:
(b) ([31]).
(c) ([24]).
(ii) Non-symmetric design:
(a) ([11]).
(b) ([16]).
(c) ([30]).
(d) ([25]).
(iii) Symmetry and non-symmetry are considered together:
(b) ([27]).
(c) is a prime numbe([28]).
(d) is a prime square ([15]).
All the above work is based on the classification of 2-designs by limiting parameters. We take a different approach and consider some simple groups as the socle of the automorphism groups to complete the classification of 2- designs.
In 2020, Tian [19] completely classified flag-transitive point-primitive 2-designs with socle , and discovered exactly 14 nonisomorphic 2-designs. In 2025, the classification of 2-design with socle was published([21]).
The classification of flag-transitive point-primitive 2-designs with alternating group as socle began in 2019, and the case of was relatively simple[20]. In 2020, the classification of 2-designs with and was completed, and the classification of 2-designs with was completed one after another.
In the process of summarizing all the 2-designs of these 6 alternating groups as the socle of the automorphism groups, we get the following two conclusions.
Theorem 1
Let , there are only flag-transitive point-primitive non-trivial - designs when the symmetric group or the alternating group acting on points, and all of which are full designs. Those designs’ parameters are , where and .
Theorem 2
Let be a non-trivial - design and be a flag-transitive, point-primitive automorphism group of almost simple type, if the socle is , then up to isomorphism there exist 87 designs. one of the following applies:
(i) When the symmetric group and the alternating group act on a set of points, the designs are full designs, listed in Table Table 1.
(ii) The designs in other cases, that is, when and acts on , are listed in Table 2.
Remark 1
- (1)
Up to isomorphism, there are 87 different 2-designs, including 84 non-symmetric designs and 3 symmetric designs: , and . 2. (2)
The parameters of the two designs, which are mutually complementary, are as follows:
and itself; and itself; and ; and ; and itself; and ; and ; and ; and ; and ; and ; and itself; and itself; and itself; and ; and ; and ; and ;
and ; and ; and . 3. (3)
There are 21 2-designs are full designs which consisting of all -subsets, and they are labeled as to in Table 1 and 2.
2 Some Preliminary Results
We present some preliminary results in this section that are used throughout this paper.
Lemma 2.1
Let be a non-trivial -design and . The following three claims are equal for any point and block :
(i) acts flag-transitively on ;
(ii) acts point-transitively on and acts transitively on , where denotes the set of all blocks which are incident with ;
(iii) acts block-transitively on and acts transitively on the points of .
Lemma 2.2
Let be a non-trivial flag-transitive - design and . Then the following hold:
(i) , , ;
(ii) , , where is any point-stabiliser of .
Proof. is a non-trivial - design, hence . From equation , we get . Fisher’s inequality implies that , then
[TABLE]
According to Lemma 2.1, acts transitively on , and acts transitively on , so and holds.
3 Proof of Theorem 1
Both symmetric groups and alternating groups exhibit strong transitivity properties.
Lemma 3.1
([22]) The symmetric group and the alternating group are respectively -transitive and -transitive on .
In fact, and are the only subgroups of that are -transitive on .
Lemma 3.2
Let and let be a subgroup of that is -transitive on . Then either or .
Proof. Since is -transitive, its action on the set of ordered -tuples of distinct elements from is transitive. In particular, the size of the orbit of any such tuple is equal to the number of ordered -tuples, which is
[TABLE]
Now, fix the ordered tuple . Let be the stabiliser of this tuple in . By the orbit-stabiliser theorem, we have
[TABLE]
Since is a subgroup of , we have . Therefore,
[TABLE]
Hence, is either 1 or 2.
If . Then , so .
If . Then . Thus, is a subgroup of of index 2. For , since the commutator subgroup of is and any index 2 subgroup is normal and contains the commutator subgroup, the only subgroup of of index 2 is . Therefore, .
Lemma 3.3
Let and be an -transitive permutation group on . If preserves a - design , then is the full design which consisting of all -subsets of .
Proof. Since is -transitive on , by Lemma 3.2, must be either the alternating group or the symmetric group .
Now, acts transitively on the set of all -subsets of for any with .
Since preserves the design , the set of blocks must be a union of orbits of acting on the set of -subsets. But since acts transitively on all -subsets, the only possible orbits are the empty set and the entire set of -subsets. Since is a -design, it must contain at least one block, so cannot be empty. Therefore, must be the set of all -subsets of , i.e., the design is the full design.
The existence of a - design for any in the given range is guaranteed by taking the full design.
Lemma 3.4
Let and be an -transitive permutation group on . Then for any integer with , there exists a - design preserved by .
Proof. By Lemma 3.2 and Lemma 3.3, or acts on , and if there is a design, it must be a full design.
For any , consider the set of all -subsets of . We first show that is a - design with . For any two distinct points , the number of -subsets containing both and is , since we choose the remaining points from the points other than and . Thus, the design condition is satisfied.
Next, we show that preserves . Since is either or , it acts transitively on the set of all -subsets of . That is, for any two -subsets and , there exists such that . In particular, for any and any , we have because is also a -subset. Therefore, preserves the design.
Hence, for any with , the full design is a - design preserved by .
Lemma 3.5
Let and be an -transitive permutation group on . Then the group acts transitively on the set of flags =.
Proof. Consider the stabiliser of in . By Lemma 3.2, is isomorphic to either or , and in either case, it acts transitively on , the set of blocks containing . This is because is in one-to-one correspondence with the set of -subsets of \cal P$$\setminus\{x\}, and acts transitively on that set (since and are transitive on -subsets for ).
Since acts point-transitively on and acts transitively on , by Lemma 2.1, the group acts flag-transitively on .
Lemma 3.6
Let and be an -transitive permutation group on . Then the group acts primitively on .
Proof. For , -transitive implies -transitive. By Theorem 9.6([22]), every -transitive group is primitive, thus the group acts primitively on .
Proof of Theory 1. By Lemma 3.1 to 3.6, for and , there are only flag-transitive point-primitive non-trivial - designs when the symmetric group or the alternating group acting on points, and all of which are full designs.
In the process of proving Lemma 3.4, has been obtained. Substituting and into the formula , , we can get , .
4 Proof of Theorem 2
In the next 2 subsections, we prove Theorem 2.
4.1 Getting Possible Parameters of 2-Designs
In this subsection, we will get all possible parameters of 2- designs.
Lemma 4.1
Let be a maximal subgroup of . If , then , but not vice versa.
Proof. Firstly, from , it can be inferred that holds. From , we can get . Substitute it into . By the hypothesis, , it follows that , and hence holds.
Secondly, if , it does not necessarily follow that . We can give a counterexample. Let , , then , and . Assuming , , we can calculate , . Obviously, holds, but does not.
Remark 2
- (1)
This lemma does not conflict with Lemma 2.2(ii), and and may not be established at the same time without knowing whether the design is flag-transitive. According to Lemma 4.1, when looking for possible design parameters, we assume that holds, so it is unnecessary to verify . 2. (2)
The counterexample in the proof of Lemma 4.1 also demonstrates that for , a design with parameters (10,180,72,4,24) cannot be constructed. However, for , such a design is constructible, as evidenced by design in Table 2.
Lemma 4.2
([26]) For or , the automorphism group , while .
Assume that there is a non-trivial 2-design admitting a flag-transitive and point-primitive almost simple automorphism group with socle . According to lemma 4.2, when , , and when , .
Lemma 4.3
([22]) Let , . A transitive group on is primitive if and only if is a maximal subgroup of .
If is any maximal subgroup of , then the permutation action of on the cosets of is primitive, so embeds as a primitive subgroups of , where .
According to Lemma 4.3, if and only if the stabiliser is a maximum subgroup of , where , then is point-primitive on . Consequently, . In the ATLAS, the maximal subgroups of are listed [5].
We calculate all possible parameters that meet the requirements listed below:
- (i)
with , and is one of its maximal subgroups; 2. (ii)
; 3. (iii)
; 4. (iv)
, and (Lemma 2.2); 5. (v)
, ; 6. (vi)
.
We obtain 2091 5-tuples of parameters with the help of the computer algebra system GAP [9]. The numbers of possible 5-tuples corresponding to group are listed in Table 3.
These possible 5-tuples parameters are verified one by one, and most of them are eliminated in the following three steps.
- Step(i)
According to Lemma 2.1, acts on in a block-transitive manner. Consequently, the subgroup of has the index . It is simple to determine whether there is at least one subgroup with index of by using the Magma-command Subgroups(G:OrderEqual:=n) where [3]. 2. Step(ii)
There is at least one orbit of with size and because acts transitively on the points of . Check whether there is such an orbit. 3. Step(iii)
For any two points, they must coexist in different blocks. Check whether this value is a fixed value.
We take two cases where acts on 280 points as examples.
Ex.1 =.
There is no subgroup with index of , so this parameters can be eliminated by Step(i).
Ex.2 =.
The symmetric group contains 17 conjugacy classes of subgroups with index 11340, and analyze them one by one.
We list the serial number of the conjugate class of subgroups in the first column in Table 4. and the orbital lengths under the action of the conjugate class in the second column. If the orbital length is 32, then the number of elements in the set generated by this orbital under the action of group is indicated in parentheses. The notation indicates that the degree appears with multiplicity . In the third column, the treatment method for this situation is given.
4.2 Basic blocks of 2-Designs
After talking about the “knockout” in the last subsection, the remaining parameters can get a total of 87 designs in Table 1 and Table 2 up to isomorphism.
In fact, when , the 21 designs in Table 1 can also be obtained directly from Theorem 1. Because they are all full designs, each -tuple can be used as a basic block of -, so it will not be listed here.
We list the basic blocks of the non-full designs list in Table 2. In the sense of isomorphism, only the basic block of the design under the action of the group in the first place are listed.
Proof of Theory 2.
In the subsection 4.1, we calculated all possible design 5-tuple parameters that satisfy the basic requirements. With the help of group theory software , we filtered out those parameters that cannot form a design.
When () and acts on points, from the content of section 3, we know that or , and according to Theorem 1, there are 21 designs in total listed in Table 1, all of which are full designs. When () and acts on points, all the designs listed in 2. In the subsection 4.2, we listed the basic blocks of all designs up to isomorphism.
This completes the proof of Theorem 2.
5 Conclusion and Future Work
This paper systematically investigates non-trivial flag-transitive and point-primitive - designs with the alternating group () as the socle of their automorphism groups.
This result resolves a key problem in the classification of designs under this group action, significantly enriches the 2-design taxonomy, and offers methodological references for classifying designs under other alternating group, sporadic or exceptional simple groups.
Funding
This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(Nos:11801092,12271173), Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation(No:2025A1515012072).
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] S. H. Alavi, M. Bayat, et al., Block designs with gcd ( r , λ ) (r,\lambda) =1 admitting flag-transitive automorphism groups, Results Math. , 77(151)(2022), 1-17.
- 2[2] A. Betten, A. Delandtsheer, M. Law, et. al., Finite line-transitive linear spaces: theory and search strategies, Acta. Math. Sinica, English Series , 25(9)(2009), 1399-1436.
- 3[3] W. Bosma, J. Cannon, C. Playoust, The MAGMA algebra system I: The user language, J. Symb. Comput. , 24 (1997), 235-265.
- 4[4] C. J. Colbourn, J. H. Dinitz, The CRC Handbook of Combinatorial Designs, CRC press, Boca Raton, FL, 2007.
- 5[5] J. H. Conway, R. T. Curtis, S. P. Norton, R. A. Parker and R. A. Wilson, Atlas of Finite Groups, Oxford University Press, London, 1985.
- 6[6] A. Delandtsheer, Finite flag-transitive linear spaces with alternating socle. In: Proceedings of the Euroconference on Algebraic Combinatorics and Applications (A. Betten et al., eds.), Springer, Berlin, 2001, 79-88.
- 7[7] H. L. Dong, S. L. Zhou, Alternating groups and flag-transitive 2- ( v , k , 4 ) (v,k,4) symmetric designs, J. Combin. Designs , 19(2011), 475-483.
- 8[8] H. L. Dong, S. L. Zhou, Flag-transitive primitive ( v , k , λ ) (v,k,\lambda) -symmetric designs with λ \lambda at most 10 10 and alternating groups, J. Algebra Appl. , 13(2014), 1450025.
