Do more citations mean better patents?
Gaetan de Rassenfosse

TL;DR
This paper reviews empirical evidence on whether patent citations reliably indicate invention importance, highlighting that citations are correlated with value but are noisy and not definitive indicators.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive survey of validation studies on patent citations as a proxy for invention importance, clarifying their strengths and limitations.
Findings
Citations are positively associated with invention value
Citation counts are correlated but noisy indicators
Citations do not definitively measure invention importance
Abstract
This article reviews the empirical evidence on the use of patent citations as a proxy for invention importance. It distinguishes between technical merit, private economic value, and social value, and surveys validation studies using expert ratings, market data, renewal records, and compensation reports. The findings confirm that while the count of citations is positively associated with various dimensions of value, it remains a noisy indicator -- correlated but far from definitive.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsIntellectual Property and Patents · Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences · scientometrics and bibliometrics research
