MedNet-PVS: A MedNeXt-Based Deep Learning Model for Automated Segmentation of Perivascular Spaces
Zhen Xuen Brandon Low, Rory Zhang, Hang Min, William Pham, Lucy Vivash, Jasmine Moses, Miranda Lynch, Karina Dorfman, Cassandra Marotta, Shaun Koh, Jacob Bunyamin, Ella Rowsthorn, Alex Jarema, Himashi Peiris, Zhaolin Chen, Sandy R. Shultz, David K. Wright, Dexiao Kong

TL;DR
This paper introduces MedNet-PVS, a deep learning model based on MedNeXt architecture, for automated segmentation of perivascular spaces in MRI scans, demonstrating high accuracy on homogeneous datasets but limited generalization across diverse data types.
Contribution
The study adapts a Transformer-inspired 3D convolutional network for PVS segmentation and evaluates its performance across different MRI datasets, highlighting strengths and limitations.
Findings
Achieved state-of-the-art Dice scores on homogeneous T2w datasets.
Lower performance observed on heterogeneous T1w datasets.
Transformer-based attention mechanisms did not outperform simpler models like nnU-Net.
Abstract
Enlarged perivascular spaces (PVS) are increasingly recognized as biomarkers of cerebral small vessel disease, Alzheimer's disease, stroke, and aging-related neurodegeneration. However, manual segmentation of PVS is time-consuming and subject to moderate inter-rater reliability, while existing automated deep learning models have moderate performance and typically fail to generalize across diverse clinical and research MRI datasets. We adapted MedNeXt-L-k5, a Transformer-inspired 3D encoder-decoder convolutional network, for automated PVS segmentation. Two models were trained: one using a homogeneous dataset of 200 T2-weighted (T2w) MRI scans from the Human Connectome Project-Aging (HCP-Aging) dataset and another using 40 heterogeneous T1-weighted (T1w) MRI volumes from seven studies across six scanners. Model performance was evaluated using internal 5-fold cross validation (5FCV) and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus · Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
