Comparison of Droop-Based Single-Loop Grid-Forming Wind Turbines: High-Frequency Open-Loop Unstable Behavior and Damping
Meng Chen, Yufei Xi, Lin Cheng, Xiongfei Wang, Ioannis Lestas

TL;DR
This paper compares droop-based grid-forming controls in wind turbines, revealing that droop-I control introduces high-frequency open-loop instability that cannot be mitigated by traditional damping methods, impacting overall system stability.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analytical and case study comparison showing that droop-I control causes inherent high-frequency instability in wind turbine systems, unlike droop control.
Findings
Droop-I control shifts high-frequency poles causing instability.
Open-loop instability cannot be mitigated by tuning control parameters.
Active damping may fail under droop-I control due to unstable poles.
Abstract
The integration of inverter-interfaced generators introduces new instability phenomena into modern power systems. This paper conducts a comparative analysis of two widely used droop-based grid-forming controls, namely droop control and droop-I control, in wind turbines. Although both approaches provide steady-state reactive power-voltage droop characteristics, their impacts on high-frequency (HF) stability differ significantly. Firstly, on open-loop (OL) comparison reveals that droop-I control alters HF pole locations. The application of Routh's Stability Criterion further analytically demonstrates that such pole shifts inevitably lead to OL instability. This HF OL instability is identified as a structural phenomenon in purely inductive grids and cannot be mitigated through control parameter tuning. As a result, droop-I control significantly degrades HF stability, making conventional…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
