The Binding Energies of Atoms on Amorphous Silicate Dust: A Computational Study
Kristoffer Hansson, W. M. C. Sameera, Clarke J. Esmerian, Duncan Bossion, Stefan Andersson, Susanne Aalto, Wouter Vlemmings, Kirsten K. Knudsen, and Gunnar Nyman

TL;DR
This study computationally determines the binding energies of key interstellar atoms on amorphous silicate dust, providing crucial data for understanding dust stability, growth, and chemical reactions in space.
Contribution
First-principles calculations of atom binding energies on amorphous silicate dust, filling a gap in data for astrophysical dust models.
Findings
Silicon, aluminum, and calcium have high binding energies, enabling stability at high temperatures.
Most other atoms exhibit weaker binding energies but remain stable against sublimation in the ISM.
Binding energies follow a log-normal distribution for most elements, informing dust evolution models.
Abstract
Context. We investigate the binding energies of atoms to interstellar dust particles, which play a key role in their growth and evolution, as well as for the chemical reactions on their surfaces. Aims. We aim to compute the binding energies of abundant atoms in the interstellar medium (C, N, O, Mg, Al, Si, S, Ca, Fe, and Ni) to silicate dust. Methods. We used the Geometries, Frequencies, and Non-covalent Interactions Tight Binding (GFN1-xTB) method to compute the binding energies. An FeMgSiO periodic surface model, containing 81 local minima on the surface, was used. Results. A range of binding energies was found for each element. The median of the binding energies follows the order Si (14.8 eV) > Al (12.8 eV) > Ca (12.7 eV) > C (9.5 eV) > O (8.1 eV) > N (6.2 eV) > Fe (6.0 eV) > S (5.2 eV) > Mg (2.4 eV). The probability distribution of binding energies for each element except Ca is…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
