Are Companies Taking AI Risks Seriously? A Systematic Analysis of Companies' AI Risk Disclosures in SEC 10-K forms
Lucas G. Uberti-Bona Marin, Bram Rijsbosch, Gerasimos Spanakis, Konrad Kollnig

TL;DR
This study systematically analyzes over 30,000 SEC 10-K filings to assess how companies disclose AI risks, revealing increased mentions but often generic disclosures, highlighting regulatory concerns about transparency and risk mitigation.
Contribution
First large-scale analysis of AI risk disclosures in SEC filings, combining quantitative and qualitative methods, and providing a publicly accessible tool for further research.
Findings
AI risk mentions increased from 4% in 2020 to 43% in 2024
Most disclosures focus on legal and competitive risks
Many disclosures are generic and lack mitigation details
Abstract
As Artificial Intelligence becomes increasingly central to corporate strategies, concerns over its risks are growing too. In response, regulators are pushing for greater transparency in how companies identify, report and mitigate AI-related risks. In the US, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) repeatedly warned companies to provide their investors with more accurate disclosures of AI-related risks; recent enforcement and litigation against companies' misleading AI claims reinforce these warnings. In the EU, new laws - like the AI Act and Digital Services Act - introduced additional rules on AI risk reporting and mitigation. Given these developments, it is essential to examine if and how companies report AI-related risks to the public. This study presents the first large-scale systematic analysis of AI risk disclosures in SEC 10-K filings, which require public companies to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
