On the Generalisation of Koopman Representations for Chaotic System Control
Kyriakos Hjikakou (1), Juan Diego Cardenas Cartagena (1), Matthia Sabatelli (1) ((1) University of Groningen, Department of Artificial Intelligence, Groningen, Netherlands)

TL;DR
This paper explores the transferability of Koopman-based representations for chaotic systems, demonstrating their effectiveness in prediction and control tasks through a three-stage learning process using the Lorenz system.
Contribution
It introduces a novel three-stage methodology for learning Koopman embeddings that are reusable across different tasks, outperforming traditional baselines.
Findings
Koopman embeddings outperform PCA baselines in accuracy and data efficiency.
Pre-trained transformer weights can be fixed during fine-tuning without performance loss.
Koopman embeddings enable multi-task learning in physics-informed machine learning.
Abstract
This paper investigates the generalisability of Koopman-based representations for chaotic dynamical systems, focusing on their transferability across prediction and control tasks. Using the Lorenz system as a testbed, we propose a three-stage methodology: learning Koopman embeddings through autoencoding, pre-training a transformer on next-state prediction, and fine-tuning for safety-critical control. Our results show that Koopman embeddings outperform both standard and physics-informed PCA baselines, achieving accurate and data-efficient performance. Notably, fixing the pre-trained transformer weights during fine-tuning leads to no performance degradation, indicating that the learned representations capture reusable dynamical structure rather than task-specific patterns. These findings support the use of Koopman embeddings as a foundation for multi-task learning in physics-informed…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
