Quantitative Outcome-Oriented Assessment of Microsurgical Anastomosis
Luyin Hu, Soheil Gholami, George Dindelegan, Torstein R. Meling, and Aude Billard

TL;DR
This paper introduces a quantitative, image-processing-based framework for objectively assessing microsurgical anastomosis quality, improving reliability and efficiency over subjective methods.
Contribution
It presents a novel geometric modeling approach that automates error detection and scoring, advancing microsurgical training and assessment protocols.
Findings
Geometric metrics replicate expert scoring effectively.
The framework enhances assessment reliability and efficiency.
Uses three datasets from hospital participants.
Abstract
Microsurgical anastomosis demands exceptional dexterity and visuospatial skills, underscoring the importance of comprehensive training and precise outcome assessment. Currently, methods such as the outcome-oriented anastomosis lapse index are used to evaluate this procedure. However, they often rely on subjective judgment, which can introduce biases that affect the reliability and efficiency of the assessment of competence. Leveraging three datasets from hospitals with participants at various levels, we introduce a quantitative framework that uses image-processing techniques for objective assessment of microsurgical anastomoses. The approach uses geometric modeling of errors along with a detection and scoring mechanism, enhancing the efficiency and reliability of microsurgical proficiency assessment and advancing training protocols. The results show that the geometric metrics…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
