Effective short intervals containing primes
Matt Visser (Victoria University of Wellington)

TL;DR
This paper makes explicit and effective certain classical results on the existence of primes within short intervals, improving bounds and extending the range of known prime-containing intervals for large x.
Contribution
It provides explicit bounds and conditions under which primes are guaranteed in short intervals, making previous asymptotic results fully effective and extendable.
Findings
Primes exist in intervals [x, x + x^{1-1/n}] for n ≥ 4 and x ≥ exp(exp(33)).
Primes exist in intervals [x, x + x^{1-1/n}] for n ≥ 91 and x ≥ [90^{90}]^{n/(n-90)}.
Primes exist in intervals [x, x + x^{1-1/n}] for n ≥ 106 for all x ≥ 1.
Abstract
95 years ago Hoheisel proved the existence of primes in the sub-linear interval \[ \left[x, x+x^{1-{1\over 33000}}\right] \qquad \hbox{for sufficiently large}. \] This was improved by Heilbronn, proving existence of primes in the interval \[ \left[x, x+x^{1-{1\over 250}}\right] \qquad \hbox{for sufficiently large}. \] More recently Baker, Harman, Pintz proved existence of primes in the interval \[ \left[x, x+ x^{1-{19\over 40}}\right] \qquad \hbox{for sufficiently large}. \] In the present article I will, to the extent possible, make some of these statements effective. Specifically, among other things, I shall show that \[ \forall n \geq 4, \qquad\forall x \geq \exp(\exp(33)), \qquad \hbox{there are primes in the interval} \left[x, x+ x^{1-{1\over n}}\right]; \] \[ \forall n \geq 91, \qquad\forall x \geq [90^{90}]^{n/(n-90)} , \qquad \hbox{there are primes in the interval}…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
