TL;DR
This paper introduces TBYS, a proactive reasoning framework that inserts generated insights between reasoning steps in large language models to improve complex reasoning tasks, especially in mathematics.
Contribution
It proposes a novel proactive insight generation method to enhance reasoning in LLMs, reducing reliance on static prompts and human-labeled data.
Findings
Improves performance on mathematical reasoning datasets
Reduces human labeling and fine-tuning efforts
Demonstrates effectiveness over prior prompting strategies
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) often exhibit deficiencies with complex reasoning tasks, such as maths, which we attribute to the discrepancy between human reasoning patterns and those presented in the LLMs' training data. When dealing with complex problems, humans tend to think carefully before expressing solutions. However, they often do not articulate their inner thoughts, including their intentions and chosen methodologies. Consequently, critical insights essential for bridging reasoning steps may be absent in training data collected from human sources. To bridge this gap, we proposes inserting \emph{insight}s between consecutive reasoning steps, which review the status and initiate the next reasoning steps. Unlike prior prompting strategies that rely on a single or a workflow of static prompts to facilitate reasoning, \emph{insight}s are \emph{proactively} generated to guide reasoning…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
