Development of the Measure of Assessment Self-Efficacy (MASE) for Quizzes and Exams
Kaitlin Riegel, Tanya Evans, Jason M. Stephens

TL;DR
This paper introduces the MASE, a new tool to measure students' beliefs about their assessment-taking abilities, including comprehension, execution, and emotional regulation, across different testing scenarios.
Contribution
It develops and validates a reliable, invariant measure of assessment self-efficacy applicable to online quizzes and final exams, filling a gap in existing assessment tools.
Findings
Two-factor models supported for both assessment scenarios.
Models demonstrated invariance over time and across student cohorts.
Scales showed evidence of validity in measuring assessment self-efficacy.
Abstract
Self-efficacy is a significant construct in education due to its predictive relationship with achievement. Existing measures of assessment-related self-efficacy concentrate on students' beliefs about content-specific tasks but omit beliefs around assessment-taking. This research aimed to develop and test the Measure of Assessment Self-Efficacy (MASE), designed to assess two types of efficacy beliefs related to assessment (i.e., 'comprehension and execution' and 'emotional regulation') in two scenarios (i.e., a low-stakes online quiz and a high-stakes final exam). Results from confirmatory factor analysis in Study 1 (N = 301) supported the hypothesised two-factor measurement models for both assessment scenarios. In Study 2, results from MGCFA (N = 277) confirmed these models were invariant over time and provided evidence for the scales' validity. Study 3 demonstrated the exam-related…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
