Quantifying The Limits of AI Reasoning: Systematic Neural Network Representations of Algorithms
Anastasis Kratsios, Dennis Zvigelsky, Bradd Hart

TL;DR
This paper systematically demonstrates that neural networks can emulate any reasoning circuit exactly, establishing their theoretical capacity to perform complex reasoning tasks without approximation.
Contribution
It introduces a meta-algorithm converting arbitrary circuits into neural networks, formalizing neural reasoning capabilities beyond universal approximation.
Findings
Neural networks can emulate any circuit exactly without approximation.
The network size scales with the circuit's complexity.
Applications include emulating algorithms and Turing machines.
Abstract
A main open question in contemporary AI research is quantifying the forms of reasoning neural networks can perform when perfectly trained. This paper answers this by interpreting reasoning tasks as circuit emulation, where the gates define the type of reasoning; e.g. Boolean gates for predicate logic, tropical circuits for dynamic programming, arithmetic and analytic gates for symbolic mathematical representation, and hybrids thereof for deeper reasoning; e.g. higher-order logic. We present a systematic meta-algorithm that converts essentially any circuit into a feedforward neural network (NN) with ReLU activations by iteratively replacing each gate with a canonical ReLU MLP emulator. We show that, on any digital computer, our construction emulates the circuit exactly--no approximation, no rounding, modular overflow included--demonstrating that no reasoning task lies beyond the reach…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
