Facilitating Matches on Allocation Platforms
Yohai Trabelsi, Abhijin Adiga, Yonatan Aumann, Sarit Kraus, S. S. Ravi

TL;DR
This paper explores how an allocation platform can improve overall utility by selectively relaxing agents' restrictions, ensuring no worse-off agents, and optimizing the process through formal models, algorithms, and real-world data analysis.
Contribution
It introduces a formal framework for facilitation in allocation platforms, proposes polynomial algorithms for optimization, and empirically demonstrates the benefits of restriction relaxation.
Findings
Relaxation of restrictions can significantly improve social welfare.
Algorithms effectively optimize restriction relaxation under various constraints.
Empirical results show practical benefits on real-world datasets.
Abstract
We consider a setting where goods are allocated to agents by way of an allocation platform (e.g., a matching platform). An ``allocation facilitator'' aims to increase the overall utility/social-good of the allocation by encouraging (some of the) agents to relax (some of) their restrictions. At the same time, the advice must not hurt agents who would otherwise be better off. Additionally, the facilitator may be constrained by a ``bound'' (a.k.a. `budget'), limiting the number and/or type of restrictions it may seek to relax. We consider the facilitator's optimization problem of choosing an optimal set of restrictions to request to relax under the aforementioned constraints. Our contributions are three-fold: (i) We provide a formal definition of the problem, including the participation guarantees to which the facilitator should adhere. We define a hierarchy of participation guarantees and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
