Aligning Core Aspects: Improving Vulnerability Proof-of-Concepts via Cross-Source Insights
Lingxiao Wang, Wenjing Dang, Mengyao Zhang, Yue Wang, Xianzong Wu, Sen Chen

TL;DR
This study analyzes the information gaps in public vulnerability PoC reports and proposes a multi-source fusion approach to enhance their completeness, significantly improving the utility of these reports for researchers.
Contribution
It is the first to systematically study PoC report deficiencies across platforms and introduces a novel multi-source fusion method to complete missing information.
Findings
All public PoC reports have at least one missing key aspect.
The proposed method completed 40.18% of PoC reports, totaling 69,583 reports.
The approach effectively mitigates information deficiency in PoC reports.
Abstract
For vulnerabilities, Proof-of-Concept (PoC) plays an irreplaceable role in demonstrating the exploitability. PoC reports may include critical information such as specific usage, test platforms, and more, providing essential insights for researchers. However, in reality, due to various PoC templates across PoC platforms, PoC reports extensively suffer from information deficiency, leading the suboptimal quality and limited usefulness. Fortunately, we found that information deficiency of PoC reports could be mitigated by the completion from multiple sources given the same referred vulnerability. In this paper, we conduct the first study on the deficiency of information in PoC reports across public platforms. We began by collecting 173,170 PoC reports from 4 different platforms and defined 8 key aspects that PoCs should contain. By integrating rule-based matching and a fine-tuned BERT-NER…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
