Logging Requirement for Continuous Auditing of Responsible Machine Learning-based Applications
Patrick Loic Foalem, Leuson Da Silva, Foutse Khomh, Heng Li, Ettore Merlo

TL;DR
This paper explores how logging practices can be enhanced to enable continuous auditing of machine learning systems, addressing transparency, fairness, and accountability concerns in responsible AI deployment.
Contribution
It identifies deficiencies in current logging practices for ML and proposes improved methods and tooling to support responsible AI auditing and compliance.
Findings
Need for systematic logging of responsible AI metrics
Enhanced logging supports transparency and accountability
Guidance for practitioners and tool developers
Abstract
Machine learning (ML) is increasingly applied across industries to automate decision-making, but concerns about ethical and legal compliance remain due to limited transparency, fairness, and accountability. Monitoring through logging a long-standing practice in traditional software offers a potential means for auditing ML applications, as logs provide traceable records of system behavior useful for debugging, performance analysis, and continuous auditing. systematically auditing models for compliance or accountability. The findings underscore the need for enhanced logging practices and tooling that systematically integrate responsible AI metrics. Such practices would support the development of auditable, transparent, and ethically responsible ML systems, aligning with growing regulatory requirements and societal expectations. By highlighting specific deficiencies and opportunities, this…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
