Cepheid Metallicity in the Leavitt Law (C-MetaLL) survey: IX. Metallicity dependence of Period-Wesenheit relations based on a homogeneous spectroscopic sample
V. Ripepi, E. Trentin, G. Catanzaro, M. Marconi, A. Bhardwaj, G. Clementini, F. Cusano, G. De Somma, R. Molinaro, T. Sicignano, J. Storm

TL;DR
This study derives updated period-Wesenheit-metallicity relations for Classical Cepheids using a large, homogeneous spectroscopic sample, revealing a significant metallicity dependence and implications for distance measurements.
Contribution
It provides the largest and most homogeneous metallicity sample to date for PWZ relations, with a detailed analysis of metallicity dependence and Gaia parallax corrections.
Findings
Stronger metallicity dependence ($ ext{γ} ext{≈ -0.5}$ mag/dex) than previous studies.
Gaia parallax zero-point offset varies smoothly, averaging about 10 μas.
Distances to LMC Cepheids are consistent with geometric estimates within uncertainties.
Abstract
The C-MetaLL project has provided homogeneous spectroscopic abundances of 290 Classical Cepheids (DCEPs) for which we have the intensity-averaged magnitudes in multiple optical and near-infrared (NIR) bands, periods, pulsation modes, and Gaia parallaxes. Our goal is to derive updated period-Wesenheit-metallicity (PWZ) relations using the largest and most homogeneous metallicity sample ever used for such analyses, covering a range of [Fe/H] dex. We computed several optical and NIR Wesenheit magnitudes using 275 DCEPs with reliable parallaxes, by applying a robust photometric parallax technique, which simultaneously fits all parameters -- including the global Gaia parallax counter-correction -- and handles outliers without data rejection. We find a stronger metallicity dependence ( mag/dex in optical, mag/dex in NIR) than recent literature…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
