No evidence ageing or declining populations compromise socio-economic performance of countries
Corey J. A. Bradshaw, Shana M. McDermott

TL;DR
This study analyzes global data and finds no evidence that ageing or declining populations harm a country's socio-economic performance, challenging common assumptions and emphasizing the importance of investment in education, skills, and technology.
Contribution
The paper provides empirical evidence that population decline and ageing do not negatively impact socio-economic outcomes, countering prevalent political and economic narratives.
Findings
Countries with low or negative population growth perform better on socio-economic indicators.
Most older and slower-growing populations have better socio-economic outcomes within countries.
Population decline and ageing are not linked to worse economic or social performance.
Abstract
Concerns about declining or ageing populations often centre on the fear that fewer people will translate to a weaker economy and lower living standards. But these fears are frequently based on oversimplified or misapplied interpretations of economic models, and appear to be driven more by political agendas rather than evidence. In reality, long-term prosperity depends more on how societies invest in education, skills, and technology, not just how many people they have. We examine national data at the global scale to test whether slower population growth or ageing populations are linked to worse economic or social outcomes. Using nine different indices of socio-economic performance (domestic comprehensive wealth, income equality, research and development expenditure, patent applications, human capital, corruption perception index, freedom, planetary pressure-adjusted Human Development…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
