Soot Planets instead of Water Worlds
Jie Li, Edwin A. Bergin, Marc M. Hirschmann, Geoffrey A. Blake, Fred J. Ciesla, Eliza M.-R. Kempton

TL;DR
This paper proposes that low-density exoplanets may be soot-rich rather than water-rich, explaining their properties and potential atmospheric compositions, and suggests such planets are common and observable with JWST.
Contribution
It introduces the concept of soot-rich planets as an alternative explanation for low-density exoplanets, challenging the water-world hypothesis.
Findings
Soot-rich planets can explain low average densities of some exoplanets.
Such planets are likely common beyond the snow line in protoplanetary disks.
Atmospheres may contain methane and hydrocarbons, affecting habitability.
Abstract
Some low-density exoplanets are thought to be water-rich worlds that formed beyond the snow line of their protoplanetary disc, possibly accreting coequal portions of rock and water. However, the compositions of bodies within the Solar System and the stability of volatile-rich solids in accretionary disks suggest that a planet rich in water should also acquire as much as 40% refractory organic carbon (``soot''). This would reduce the water mass fraction well below 50%, making the composition of these planets similar to those of Solar System comets. Here we show that soot-rich planets, with or without water, can account for the low average densities of exoplanets that were previously attributed to a binary combination of rock and water. Formed in locations beyond the soot and/or snow lines in disks, these planets are likely common in our galaxy and already observed by JWST. The surfaces…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
