Causal Dynamic Resonance
Claudia Lainscsek, Pariya Salami, Simon Draeger, Sydney S. Cash, and Terrence J. Sejnowski

TL;DR
Causal Dynamic Resonance (CDR) enhances causality detection in complex nonlinear systems by adding noise to signals, improving accuracy in both simulated and real brain data, especially in epilepsy monitoring.
Contribution
This paper introduces Causal Dynamic Resonance, a novel method that improves causality detection by incorporating noise, addressing limitations of existing measures like CD-DDA.
Findings
Enhanced detection of causality in coupled systems
Reduced false positives with noise addition
Effective application to epilepsy iEEG data
Abstract
Natural dynamical systems, including the brain and climate, are highly nonlinear and complex. Determining information flow among the components that make up these dynamical systems is challenging. If the components are the result of a common process or become synchronized, causality measures typically fail, including Cross-Dynamical Delay Differential Analysis (CD-DDA). We previously introduced Dynamical Ergodicity Delay Differential Analysis (DE-DDA) to assess dynamical similarity. Here, we further increase the detection of false positives in causality by adding white noise to the signals, but not the dynamical system. Causal Dynamic Resonance (CDR) is applied to coupled R\"ossler systems where the ground truth is known and also to invasive intracranial electroencephalographic (iEEG) data from drug-resistant epilepsy patients undergoing presurgical monitoring.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
